Pharmacokinetic Comparison and Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Empagliflozin/Metformin Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets in Healthy Subjects under Fed Conditions

Background: Empagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, and Metformin, a biguanide, are commonly prescribed together for the management of type 2 diabetes. This study evaluates the bioequivalence of a fixed-dose combination of Empagliflozin and Metformin (12.5/1000 mg) in healthy subjects under fed conditions. The goal is to ensure that generic versions deliver the same therapeutic effect as the reference product. Materials and Methods: This study was a randomized, open-label, two-period, two-sequence, crossover trial aimed at evaluating the bioequivalence (BE) profiles of two fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of Empagliflozin and Metformin. The assessment of bioequivalence focused on the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time t (AUC0-t), and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) for both the test and reference formulations. Out of 46 screened participants, 17 were enrolled, of whom 15 completed both treatment periods. In each period, serial blood samples were collected for a duration of up to 72 hours following the oral administration of the study medications. Plasma concentrations of Empagliflozin and Metformin were quantified using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methodology. The drug products were deemed bioequivalent if the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the test/reference ratios was within the range of 80.00% to 125.00% for the natural logarithm-transformed Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞. Tolerability and safety were continuously monitored throughout the study. Results: Based on the rate and extent of absorption, the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were similar between the test product (T) and reference product (R). The 90% CI of the test/reference ratios of log-transformed PK parameters point estimates for Empagliflozin were Cmax: 97.39% (87.80% - 108.02%), AUC0-t: 95.40% (90.67% - 100.37%), and AUC0-∞: 95.98% (90.93% - 101.32%) and Cmax: 96.72% (84.39% - 110.84%), AUC0-t: 98.30% (89.94% - 107.43%), and AUC0-∞: 97.69% (89.53% - 106.59%) for Metformin, respectively (90% CI for all PK parameters fell within 80.00% - 125.00%). Conclusion: Our findings confirmed in vivo bioequivalence between the test and reference formulations of Empagliflozin 12.5 mg/Metformin 1000 mg under fed conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojemd.2025.153004
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmacokinetic Comparison and Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Empagliflozin/Metformin Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets in Healthy Subjects under Fed Conditions

Nayan Ghosh, Sabrina Akter Tushi, Uttom Kumar Bhowmik, Md. Alimur Reza et al.
Open Journal of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Pharmacokinetic Comparison and Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Empagliflozin/Metformin Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets in Healthy Subjects under Fed Conditions

Nayan Ghosh, Sabrina Akter Tushi, Uttom Kumar Bhowmik, Md. Alimur Reza, Nithon Chandra Sahana, Md. Ashiqur Rahman
article en

Abstract

Background: Empagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, and Metformin, a biguanide, are commonly prescribed together for the management of type 2 diabetes. This study evaluates the bioequivalence of a fixed-dose combination of Empagliflozin and Metformin (12.5/1000 mg) in healthy subjects under fed conditions. The goal is to ensure that generic versions deliver the same therapeutic effect as the reference product. Materials and Methods: This study was a randomized, open-label, two-period, two-sequence, crossover trial aimed at evaluating the bioequivalence (BE) profiles of two fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of Empagliflozin and Metformin. The assessment of bioequivalence focused on the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time t (AUC0-t), and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) for both the test and reference formulations. Out of 46 screened participants, 17 were enrolled, of whom 15 completed both treatment periods. In each period, serial blood samples were collected for a duration of up to 72 hours following the oral administration of the study medications. Plasma concentrations of Empagliflozin and Metformin were quantified using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methodology. The drug products were deemed bioequivalent if the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the test/reference ratios was within the range of 80.00% to 125.00% for the natural logarithm-transformed Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞. Tolerability and safety were continuously monitored throughout the study. Results: Based on the rate and extent of absorption, the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were similar between the test product (T) and reference product (R). The 90% CI of the test/reference ratios of log-transformed PK parameters point estimates for Empagliflozin were Cmax: 97.39% (87.80% - 108.02%), AUC0-t: 95.40% (90.67% - 100.37%), and AUC0-∞: 95.98% (90.93% - 101.32%) and Cmax: 96.72% (84.39% - 110.84%), AUC0-t: 98.30% (89.94% - 107.43%), and AUC0-∞: 97.69% (89.53% - 106.59%) for Metformin, respectively (90% CI for all PK parameters fell within 80.00% - 125.00%). Conclusion: Our findings confirmed in vivo bioequivalence between the test and reference formulations of Empagliflozin 12.5 mg/Metformin 1000 mg under fed conditions.

Open Journal of Endocrine and Metabolic DiseasesVol. 15(03)
Micro Focus (United States) (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.