Generalizing the Regret: an Analysis of Lower and Upper Bounds

The (expected cumulative) regret is the customary index to judge the performance of online sequential decision-making algorithms. In the traditional form, it is defined as the expected sum over a learning horizon T of the sub-optimality gaps ∆It (i.e., expected instantaneous regret) the agent suffers when playing arm It at round t. In this paper, we propose and investigate a generalization of this notion, named g-(expected cumulative) regret, obtained by applying a transformation function g to the sub-optimality gaps, making the agent suffer g(∆It) instead of just ∆It . Intuitively, function g embeds the “perception” that the agent manifests when performing a sub-optimal decision. We first show that sublinear g-regret is not achievable for a generic transformation function g. Then, we introduce a mild condition on g and provide instance-dependent and worst-case (i.e., minimax) lower bounds for the g-regret. Finally, we show that state-of-the-art stochastic bandit algorithms with no modification surprisingly display optimal performances for the g-regret. Specifically, we prove that UCB1 matches (up to constant factors) the instance-dependent lower bound regardless of function g and that MOSS matches (up to constant factors) the minimax lower bound at least for a wide class of transformation functions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.17614
Primary Topic
Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalizing the Regret: an Analysis of Lower and Upper Bounds

Marco Mussi, Alberto Maria Metelli
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
article

Generalizing the Regret: an Analysis of Lower and Upper Bounds

Marco Mussi, Alberto Maria Metelli
article en

Abstract

The (expected cumulative) regret is the customary index to judge the performance of online sequential decision-making algorithms. In the traditional form, it is defined as the expected sum over a learning horizon T of the sub-optimality gaps ∆It (i.e., expected instantaneous regret) the agent suffers when playing arm It at round t. In this paper, we propose and investigate a generalization of this notion, named g-(expected cumulative) regret, obtained by applying a transformation function g to the sub-optimality gaps, making the agent suffer g(∆It) instead of just ∆It . Intuitively, function g embeds the “perception” that the agent manifests when performing a sub-optimal decision. We first show that sublinear g-regret is not achievable for a generic transformation function g. Then, we introduce a mild condition on g and provide instance-dependent and worst-case (i.e., minimax) lower bounds for the g-regret. Finally, we show that state-of-the-art stochastic bandit algorithms with no modification surprisingly display optimal performances for the g-regret. Specifically, we prove that UCB1 matches (up to constant factors) the instance-dependent lower bound regardless of function g and that MOSS matches (up to constant factors) the minimax lower bound at least for a wide class of transformation functions.

Journal of Artificial Intelligence ResearchVol. 82
Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generalizing the Regret: an Analysis of Lower and Upper Bounds — Marco Mussi, Alberto Maria Metelli · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS