Diachronic variations of metadiscourse markers in research articles

Metadiscourse markers (MDMs) are rhetorical devices used to enhance audience comprehension (interactive MDMs) and engage authors and audiences within a text (interactional MDMs). This study examines diachronic variation in the use of interactive and interactional MDMs across 240 research articles (RAs) from soft-pure (English literature), soft-applied (applied linguistics), hard-applied (pharmacology), and hard-pure (mathematics) disciplines, published in two periods (1994–1998 and 2019–2023). Using descriptive and inferential statistics, along with commentary on corpus excerpts, the results revealed distinct patterns of diachronic changes in MDM use, confirming temporal and disciplinary variations. Based on the findings, the study provides recommendations for English for academic purposes (EAP) and reading and writing courses. Additionally, suggestions for future research on this underexplored variation are offered. • MDM increased in the 2019–2023 RAs in comparison to the 1994–1998 RAs. • Interactive markers increased in soft-applied RAs. • Interactive markers increased in hard-applied and hard-pure RAs. • Interactional markers increased in soft-pure and soft-applied RAs. • Interactional markers increased in hard-applied RAs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101363
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diachronic variations of metadiscourse markers in research articles

Mohammad Javad Rezai, Fatemeh Mahdavirad, Armin Abbasi Aghdam
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

Diachronic variations of metadiscourse markers in research articles

Mohammad Javad Rezai, Fatemeh Mahdavirad, Armin Abbasi Aghdam
article en

Abstract

Metadiscourse markers (MDMs) are rhetorical devices used to enhance audience comprehension (interactive MDMs) and engage authors and audiences within a text (interactional MDMs). This study examines diachronic variation in the use of interactive and interactional MDMs across 240 research articles (RAs) from soft-pure (English literature), soft-applied (applied linguistics), hard-applied (pharmacology), and hard-pure (mathematics) disciplines, published in two periods (1994–1998 and 2019–2023). Using descriptive and inferential statistics, along with commentary on corpus excerpts, the results revealed distinct patterns of diachronic changes in MDM use, confirming temporal and disciplinary variations. Based on the findings, the study provides recommendations for English for academic purposes (EAP) and reading and writing courses. Additionally, suggestions for future research on this underexplored variation are offered. • MDM increased in the 2019–2023 RAs in comparison to the 1994–1998 RAs. • Interactive markers increased in soft-applied RAs. • Interactive markers increased in hard-applied and hard-pure RAs. • Interactional markers increased in soft-pure and soft-applied RAs. • Interactional markers increased in hard-applied RAs.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 11
Yazd University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.