THE TREATY OF SEVRES AND THE FATE OF THE ARMENIAN QUESTION. HOPES AND DISAPPOINTMENTS

About 100 years ago, a treaty was signed between the Turkish Sultanate and the Entente countries, where there was a reference to the Armenian question. Turkey recognized the independence of Armenia. According to this treaty, the President of the United States of America Woodrow Wilson was asked to draw the borders of the future independent Armenia. These borders were to pass within within the boundaries of Erzurum, Van, Bitlisi, Trabzon (Trebizond). However, Woodrow Wilson made an arbitration decision on the borders quite late, on November 22, 1920. However, the Treaty of Sevres never came into force. But one thing remained a fact: 875 years after the painful fall of Bagratid Armenia, as well as 545 years after the fall of the Cilician Kingdom, the right of the Armenian people to restore an independent state on the Armenian Highlands was recognized as invalid at the international level. This was a phenomenon of great importance, since the right of the Armenian people to self-determination on their historical territory was recognized, and this was a very encouraging fact for the solution of the Armenian Question, but the provisions of the treaty were not implemented. This problem has always been at the center of our scientific and historical thought. There are many studies, books and articles devoted to this problem, and today, 100 years later, an attempt is being made to examine the philosophy of the Treaty of Sèvres and why it could not have been realized. We hope that a historical situation will be created in which this problem will be solved anyway.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL FOR ARMENIAN STUDIES
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24234/journalforarmenianstudies.v3i66.126
Primary Topic
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE TREATY OF SEVRES AND THE FATE OF THE ARMENIAN QUESTION. HOPES AND DISAPPOINTMENTS

A. A. Melkonyan
JOURNAL FOR ARMENIAN STUDIES
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
article

THE TREATY OF SEVRES AND THE FATE OF THE ARMENIAN QUESTION. HOPES AND DISAPPOINTMENTS

A. A. Melkonyan
article en

Abstract

About 100 years ago, a treaty was signed between the Turkish Sultanate and the Entente countries, where there was a reference to the Armenian question. Turkey recognized the independence of Armenia. According to this treaty, the President of the United States of America Woodrow Wilson was asked to draw the borders of the future independent Armenia. These borders were to pass within within the boundaries of Erzurum, Van, Bitlisi, Trabzon (Trebizond). However, Woodrow Wilson made an arbitration decision on the borders quite late, on November 22, 1920. However, the Treaty of Sevres never came into force. But one thing remained a fact: 875 years after the painful fall of Bagratid Armenia, as well as 545 years after the fall of the Cilician Kingdom, the right of the Armenian people to restore an independent state on the Armenian Highlands was recognized as invalid at the international level. This was a phenomenon of great importance, since the right of the Armenian people to self-determination on their historical territory was recognized, and this was a very encouraging fact for the solution of the Armenian Question, but the provisions of the treaty were not implemented. This problem has always been at the center of our scientific and historical thought. There are many studies, books and articles devoted to this problem, and today, 100 years later, an attempt is being made to examine the philosophy of the Treaty of Sèvres and why it could not have been realized. We hope that a historical situation will be created in which this problem will be solved anyway.

JOURNAL FOR ARMENIAN STUDIESVol. 3(66)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.