Troubling autonomous public transport: Comparing people with ambulatory disability and older adults’ perceived barriers, identification, and communication preferences

• We compare people with ambulatory disability and older adults’ perceptions of autonomous public transport (APT) in Singapore. • Both groups expressed distinct barriers to and opposing valuation of APT. • Both groups had different preferences for communication about APT. • Findings suggest that APT prioritises efficiency over diversity and inclusion. • We critique how disability and old age identities are paired as beneficiaries of APT. This study responds to how people with disability and older adults are jointly figured as warrants for autonomous public transport development in Singapore. As the state seeks to incorporate autonomous technology into its public transport system, the associated discourse has uncritically paired disability and ageing identities as potential beneficiaries. Drawing upon focus group data with 20 people with ambulatory disability and 21 older adults, we found that both groups perceived distinct barriers to autonomous public transport use, differed in their identification with the logics undergirding the technology’s development, and had different preferences for related communication. Yet, despite participants’ opposing valuation of autonomous public transport, their responses gestured toward an overarching technology system that has prioritised efficiency over the inclusion of diverse body-minds. Our findings further reveal how people with ambulatory disability and older adults view themselves to be outside the boundaries of the normative APT user—people who are non-disabled, young, and receptive to technology. This study contributes to a broader understanding of how disability and ageing studies can productively converge to assess the systems of disadvantage that have defined the social positions of both identities. Simultaneously, our findings caution against inappropriately conflating the lived experiences and perspectives of people with disability and older adults, especially regarding the design and communication of new transport technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Travel Behaviour and Society
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101029
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Older Adults Driving Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
23.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Troubling autonomous public transport: Comparing people with ambulatory disability and older adults’ perceived barriers, identification, and communication preferences

Wenqi Tan, Shirley S. Ho
5 citations
Travel Behaviour and Society
Older Adults Driving Studies
23.80
article

Troubling autonomous public transport: Comparing people with ambulatory disability and older adults’ perceived barriers, identification, and communication preferences

Wenqi Tan, Shirley S. Ho
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• We compare people with ambulatory disability and older adults’ perceptions of autonomous public transport (APT) in Singapore. • Both groups expressed distinct barriers to and opposing valuation of APT. • Both groups had different preferences for communication about APT. • Findings suggest that APT prioritises efficiency over diversity and inclusion. • We critique how disability and old age identities are paired as beneficiaries of APT. This study responds to how people with disability and older adults are jointly figured as warrants for autonomous public transport development in Singapore. As the state seeks to incorporate autonomous technology into its public transport system, the associated discourse has uncritically paired disability and ageing identities as potential beneficiaries. Drawing upon focus group data with 20 people with ambulatory disability and 21 older adults, we found that both groups perceived distinct barriers to autonomous public transport use, differed in their identification with the logics undergirding the technology’s development, and had different preferences for related communication. Yet, despite participants’ opposing valuation of autonomous public transport, their responses gestured toward an overarching technology system that has prioritised efficiency over the inclusion of diverse body-minds. Our findings further reveal how people with ambulatory disability and older adults view themselves to be outside the boundaries of the normative APT user—people who are non-disabled, young, and receptive to technology. This study contributes to a broader understanding of how disability and ageing studies can productively converge to assess the systems of disadvantage that have defined the social positions of both identities. Simultaneously, our findings caution against inappropriately conflating the lived experiences and perspectives of people with disability and older adults, especially regarding the design and communication of new transport technology.

Travel Behaviour and SocietyVol. 40
The University of Sydney (AU), Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Older Adults Driving Studies
23.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.