Income inequality in the uptake of environmentally friendly products

The uptake of environmentally friendly products is unequal and income-dependent. Whether solar panels or electric vehicles, lower income groups are often locked out of the benefits they offer. Worse, policies encouraging the adoption of environmentally friendly products have replicated or even exacerbated inequalities. We experiment with analytical and agent-based models to examine mechanisms driving this inequality trap and explore policy solutions. Considering economic factors and social desirability aspects of green products, we compare adoption across income quartiles. Our findings indicate higher-income groups are much more sensitive to social desirability, including environmental awareness and peer and status effects, while lower-income groups are primarily concerned with financial constraints. Additionally, social tipping points can either enhance or hinder adoption, depending on the level of economic inequality. Without a targeted approach addressing the financial barriers of lower-income groups alongside community-wide interventions achieving a just energy transition will remain a challenge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.112277
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
43.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Income inequality in the uptake of environmentally friendly products

Martina Maglicic, Vítor V. Vasconcelos
7 citations
iScience
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
43.24
article

Income inequality in the uptake of environmentally friendly products

Martina Maglicic, Vítor V. Vasconcelos
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The uptake of environmentally friendly products is unequal and income-dependent. Whether solar panels or electric vehicles, lower income groups are often locked out of the benefits they offer. Worse, policies encouraging the adoption of environmentally friendly products have replicated or even exacerbated inequalities. We experiment with analytical and agent-based models to examine mechanisms driving this inequality trap and explore policy solutions. Considering economic factors and social desirability aspects of green products, we compare adoption across income quartiles. Our findings indicate higher-income groups are much more sensitive to social desirability, including environmental awareness and peer and status effects, while lower-income groups are primarily concerned with financial constraints. Additionally, social tipping points can either enhance or hinder adoption, depending on the level of economic inequality. Without a targeted approach addressing the financial barriers of lower-income groups alongside community-wide interventions achieving a just energy transition will remain a challenge.

iScienceVol. 28(4)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
European Commission, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Horizon 2020
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
43.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Income inequality in the uptake of environmentally friendly products — Martina Maglicic, Vítor V. Vasconcelos · iScience (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS