Monte Carlo simulation of beam quality correction factor <i>k<sub>Q</sub> </i> for carbon-ion beams using FLUKA and GATE for selected cylindrical and plane-parallel ionization chambers

<i>Objective</i>. To benchmark Monte Carlo codes FLUKA and GATE/Geant4 regarding the beam quality correction factors of ionization chambers for monoenergetic carbon-ion beams against experimental results by Holm<i>et al</i>(2022<i>Phys. Med. Biol.</i><b>67</b>49401).<i>Approach</i>. Monte Carlo codes FLUKA and GATE/Geant4 were used to simulate the beam quality correction factorkQfor one plane-parallel (PTW 34001) and two cylindrical ionization chambers (PTW 30013 and IBA FC65-G) using two monoenergetic carbon-ion beams and an energy modulated beam in accordance with Holm<i>et al</i>(2022<i>Phys. Med. Biol.</i><b>67</b>49401). Additionally, chamber-specific factorfQand perturbation factorpQwere calculated. Differences between Geant4 reference physics lists were investigated by comparing simulated depth dose distributions,fQ, andpQvalues for 429 MeV u<sup>-1</sup>.<i>Main results</i>. SimulatedkQfactors were found to differ from experimentally determinedkQfactors of Holm<i>et al</i>(2022<i>Phys. Med. Biol.</i><b>67</b>49401) by 2.5% for cylindrical chambers, whereas the plane-parallel chamber showed larger deviations of 3.1/2.6% (GATE/FLUKA), exceeding the simulation uncertainty of 1.7%.fQandpQfactors simulated using different Geant4 physics lists were comparable within the Type-A uncertainty of 0.2%. Nevertheless, the depth dose curves for physics lists using the INCL++ model showed an increase in dose at all depths except for the fragmentation tail. Differences infQfactors between Monte Carlo codes FLUKA and GATE of up to 1.8% have been observed.<i>Significance</i>. More investigations are needed to understand the cause of the observed deviations between experimental results and Monte Carlo calculations of beam quality correction factorkQ. No statistically significant differences are observed between investigated Geant4 physics lists forfQ,kQ, andpQsimulations. Notably, differences between Monte Carlo codes FLUKA and GATE are one of the main sources that limit the current simulation uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adc5d5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monte Carlo simulation of beam quality correction factor kQ for carbon-ion beams using FLUKA and GATE for selected cylindrical and plane-parallel ionization chambers

B Poppe, Kilian‐Simon Baumann, Yuri Simeonov, Jessica Stolzenberg et al.
1 citations
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
1.52
article

Monte Carlo simulation of beam quality correction factor kQ for carbon-ion beams using FLUKA and GATE for selected cylindrical and plane-parallel ionization chambers

B Poppe, Kilian‐Simon Baumann, Yuri Simeonov, Jessica Stolzenberg, Pascal Saße, Hui Khee Looe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective</i>. To benchmark Monte Carlo codes FLUKA and GATE/Geant4 regarding the beam quality correction factors of ionization chambers for monoenergetic carbon-ion beams against experimental results by Holm<i>et al</i>(2022<i>Phys. Med. Biol.</i><b>67</b>49401).<i>Approach</i>. Monte Carlo codes FLUKA and GATE/Geant4 were used to simulate the beam quality correction factorkQfor one plane-parallel (PTW 34001) and two cylindrical ionization chambers (PTW 30013 and IBA FC65-G) using two monoenergetic carbon-ion beams and an energy modulated beam in accordance with Holm<i>et al</i>(2022<i>Phys. Med. Biol.</i><b>67</b>49401). Additionally, chamber-specific factorfQand perturbation factorpQwere calculated. Differences between Geant4 reference physics lists were investigated by comparing simulated depth dose distributions,fQ, andpQvalues for 429 MeV u<sup>-1</sup>.<i>Main results</i>. SimulatedkQfactors were found to differ from experimentally determinedkQfactors of Holm<i>et al</i>(2022<i>Phys. Med. Biol.</i><b>67</b>49401) by 2.5% for cylindrical chambers, whereas the plane-parallel chamber showed larger deviations of 3.1/2.6% (GATE/FLUKA), exceeding the simulation uncertainty of 1.7%.fQandpQfactors simulated using different Geant4 physics lists were comparable within the Type-A uncertainty of 0.2%. Nevertheless, the depth dose curves for physics lists using the INCL++ model showed an increase in dose at all depths except for the fragmentation tail. Differences infQfactors between Monte Carlo codes FLUKA and GATE of up to 1.8% have been observed.<i>Significance</i>. More investigations are needed to understand the cause of the observed deviations between experimental results and Monte Carlo calculations of beam quality correction factorkQ. No statistically significant differences are observed between investigated Geant4 physics lists forfQ,kQ, andpQsimulations. Notably, differences between Monte Carlo codes FLUKA and GATE are one of the main sources that limit the current simulation uncertainty.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(8)
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE), Institute of Environmental Protection (PL), Pius Hospital Oldenburg (DE), Technische Hochschule Mittelhessen (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Hessisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.