Exploring the impacts of generative AI on artistic innovation routines

Generative AI (GenAI) is now being used in many computer-based knowledge works by various human–AI collaborations, as a major recent technological shift. However, micro-level research of GenAI impacts is rare. Moreover, whilst the creative industries are early adopters and heavy users of GenAI, there is a lack of research in this domain. To bridge these gaps, this study implemented an inductive approach to evaluate the application of GenAI in artistic innovation based on a detailed case study in a show production firm making use of company documents, interviews, and observations. The theoretical lens of routine dynamics reveals the nature of the impacts. As both a working tool and a communication facilitator, the collective application of GenAI as the working medium led to the ostensive sequence change of routines as simultaneous exploration of problems and solutions for creativity and innovation. We provide two main theoretical implications. First, individual and collective application of GenAI as both digital working tool and medium in artistic creation can improve productivity of creation and iteration. Second, such human-AI collaboration results in the routine adaptation of ostensive aspect by changing the path and interface of routine clusters and mixtures the sequential routines within creation with local events rather than systematically transforming routines. • GenAI is both a working tool and communication facilitator for artistic innovation. • Individual applications of GenAI improve creator productivity. • Collective applications of GenAI change the ostensive aspects of routines. • GenAI enables simultaneous exploration of problems and solutions for innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technovation
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103209
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the impacts of generative AI on artistic innovation routines

Yang Liu, David Baxter, Wenyi Chu
9 citations
Technovation
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
19.06
article

Exploring the impacts of generative AI on artistic innovation routines

Yang Liu, David Baxter, Wenyi Chu
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Generative AI (GenAI) is now being used in many computer-based knowledge works by various human–AI collaborations, as a major recent technological shift. However, micro-level research of GenAI impacts is rare. Moreover, whilst the creative industries are early adopters and heavy users of GenAI, there is a lack of research in this domain. To bridge these gaps, this study implemented an inductive approach to evaluate the application of GenAI in artistic innovation based on a detailed case study in a show production firm making use of company documents, interviews, and observations. The theoretical lens of routine dynamics reveals the nature of the impacts. As both a working tool and a communication facilitator, the collective application of GenAI as the working medium led to the ostensive sequence change of routines as simultaneous exploration of problems and solutions for creativity and innovation. We provide two main theoretical implications. First, individual and collective application of GenAI as both digital working tool and medium in artistic creation can improve productivity of creation and iteration. Second, such human-AI collaboration results in the routine adaptation of ostensive aspect by changing the path and interface of routine clusters and mixtures the sequential routines within creation with local events rather than systematically transforming routines. • GenAI is both a working tool and communication facilitator for artistic innovation. • Individual applications of GenAI improve creator productivity. • Collective applications of GenAI change the ostensive aspects of routines. • GenAI enables simultaneous exploration of problems and solutions for innovation.

TechnovationVol. 143
University of Southampton (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
19.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.