Web-Based Real-Time Alarm and Teleoperation System for Autonomous Navigation Failures Using ROS 1 and ROS 2

This paper presents an alarm system and teleoperation control framework, comparing ROS 1 and ROS 2 within a local network to mitigate the risk of robots failing to reach their goals during autonomous navigation. Such failures can occur when the robot moves through irregular terrain, becomes stuck on small steps, or approaches walls and obstacles without maintaining a safe distance. These issues may arise due to a combination of technical, environmental, and operational factors, including inaccurate sensor data, sensor blind spots, localization errors, infeasible path planning, and an inability to adapt to unexpected obstacles. The system integrates a web-based graphical interface developed using frontend frameworks and a joystick for real-time monitoring and control of the robot’s localization, velocity, and proximity to obstacles. The robot is equipped with RGB-D and tracking cameras, a 2D LiDAR, and odometry sensors, providing detailed environmental data. The alarm system provides sensory feedback through visual alerts on the web interface and vibration alerts on the joystick when the robot approaches walls, faces potential collisions with objects, or loses stability. The system is evaluated in both simulation (Gazebo) and real-world experiments, where latency is measured and sensor performance is assessed for both ROS 1 and ROS 2. The results demonstrate that both systems can operate effectively in real time, ensuring the robot’s safety and enabling timely operator intervention. ROS 2 offers lower latency for LiDAR and joystick inputs, making it advantageous over ROS 1. However, camera latency is higher, suggesting the need for potential optimizations in image data processing. Additionally, the platform supports the integration of additional sensors or applications based on user requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Actuators
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/act14040164
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Web-Based Real-Time Alarm and Teleoperation System for Autonomous Navigation Failures Using ROS 1 and ROS 2

Eugene Auh, Manuel S. Alvarez‐Alvarado, Daniel S. Moran, Hyungpil Moon et al.
5 citations
Actuators
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
24.97
article

Web-Based Real-Time Alarm and Teleoperation System for Autonomous Navigation Failures Using ROS 1 and ROS 2

Eugene Auh, Manuel S. Alvarez‐Alvarado, Daniel S. Moran, Hyungpil Moon, Nabih Pico, Giovanny Mite
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This paper presents an alarm system and teleoperation control framework, comparing ROS 1 and ROS 2 within a local network to mitigate the risk of robots failing to reach their goals during autonomous navigation. Such failures can occur when the robot moves through irregular terrain, becomes stuck on small steps, or approaches walls and obstacles without maintaining a safe distance. These issues may arise due to a combination of technical, environmental, and operational factors, including inaccurate sensor data, sensor blind spots, localization errors, infeasible path planning, and an inability to adapt to unexpected obstacles. The system integrates a web-based graphical interface developed using frontend frameworks and a joystick for real-time monitoring and control of the robot’s localization, velocity, and proximity to obstacles. The robot is equipped with RGB-D and tracking cameras, a 2D LiDAR, and odometry sensors, providing detailed environmental data. The alarm system provides sensory feedback through visual alerts on the web interface and vibration alerts on the joystick when the robot approaches walls, faces potential collisions with objects, or loses stability. The system is evaluated in both simulation (Gazebo) and real-world experiments, where latency is measured and sensor performance is assessed for both ROS 1 and ROS 2. The results demonstrate that both systems can operate effectively in real time, ensuring the robot’s safety and enabling timely operator intervention. ROS 2 offers lower latency for LiDAR and joystick inputs, making it advantageous over ROS 1. However, camera latency is higher, suggesting the need for potential optimizations in image data processing. Additionally, the platform supports the integration of additional sensors or applications based on user requirements.

ActuatorsVol. 14(4)
Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral (EC), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
24.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.