Development bank as a post-crisis sectoral state measure of institutional influence on the banking system of Ukraine

Introduction. The search for effective measures of state influence on the banking system by establishing financial institutions to support development in order to achieve the set development goals and the efficiency of investing public funds in the banking sector is relevant at the present time. Problem Statement. An unresolved problem is the choice of the institutional model of the national development assistance structure - a bank or a non-bank institution - the content of its mandate, effective supervision of the state as a shareholder and ensuring proper state post-crisis influence on the banking system of Ukraine. Purpose is to identify possible ways to effectively apply the European institutional experience of post-crisis sectoral measures of institutional influence on the banking system through the formation of the structure of national development banks for the post-war revival of the Ukrainian economy, based on an analysis of the management features of state development banks Methods. The following general scientific and special methods were used: dialectical method, principles of economic and statistical analysis and scientific synthesis, methods of comparative and factor analysis, induction and deduction. Results. The article analyses the successful historical experience of national development banks of the EU countries, summarizes approaches to the use of development banks to overcome market failures, identifies advantages and disadvantages of two models of development banks. Proposals are made on the limits of concentration and the optimal share of the state, evaluation of activities and improvement of corporate governance of state development institutions. Conclusions. It is recommended to take into account the German, Austrian and Polish experience in transforming development banking institutions in the final adoption of Ukrainian legislation on the establishment of financial su institutions to support development. Among the post-crisis sectoral measures to resolve the contradictions in the implementation of the State’s influence on qualitative changes in the domestic banking system, the author proposes an ‘institutional triad’: Privatization of Banks with State participation through the mechanism of ‘People’s IPO’; Creation of not one, but two national promotional development institutions - the National Development Institution and the Ukrainian Bank for Recovery and Development; Preparation and implementation of a set of regulatory and institutional changes in the structure of corporate governance of the state share of banking system of Ukraine.