Thank You to Our 2024 Reviewers

Abstract The entire editorial board of the Journal of Geophysical Research‐Solid Earth would like to sincerely thank all our colleagues who reviewed manuscripts for us in 2024. The hours they spent reading in order to provide insightful comments on manuscripts not only help improve the quality of these manuscripts but also ensure the scientific rigor of our reviewing process and eventually, of the research published in the field of Solid Earth Geophysics by our journal. With the advent of open science and AGU's data policy, the reviewing process now also encompasses checking the accessibility and availability of data and developed software. This is a key objective of AGU's FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) (FAIR) policy, for which many reviewers have provided suggestions that helped to improve the data presentation and availability, and which also fed the editorial board's reflection on the matter. Of course, we particularly appreciate timely reviews, particularly in light of the growing demands imposed by the increase of manuscripts submitted to Journal of Geophysical Research‐Solid Earth . We received 1,999 submissions in 2024, and 1,628 reviewers contributed to their evaluation by providing 2,534 reviews in total. We are deeply thankful for all of their contributions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jb031548
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thank You to Our 2024 Reviewers

Yves Bernabé, M. D. Behn, Mark J. Dekkers, Anke Friedrich et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Research Data Management Practices
article

Thank You to Our 2024 Reviewers

Yves Bernabé, M. D. Behn, Mark J. Dekkers, Anke Friedrich, Shin‐Chan Han, Fenglin Niu, Satoshi Ide, S. K. Ebmeier, Alexandre Schubnel, Douglas R. Schmitt, Jun Tsuchiya, Rachel E. Abercrombie
article en

Abstract

Abstract The entire editorial board of the Journal of Geophysical Research‐Solid Earth would like to sincerely thank all our colleagues who reviewed manuscripts for us in 2024. The hours they spent reading in order to provide insightful comments on manuscripts not only help improve the quality of these manuscripts but also ensure the scientific rigor of our reviewing process and eventually, of the research published in the field of Solid Earth Geophysics by our journal. With the advent of open science and AGU's data policy, the reviewing process now also encompasses checking the accessibility and availability of data and developed software. This is a key objective of AGU's FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) (FAIR) policy, for which many reviewers have provided suggestions that helped to improve the data presentation and availability, and which also fed the editorial board's reflection on the matter. Of course, we particularly appreciate timely reviews, particularly in light of the growing demands imposed by the increase of manuscripts submitted to Journal of Geophysical Research‐Solid Earth . We received 1,999 submissions in 2024, and 1,628 reviewers contributed to their evaluation by providing 2,534 reviews in total. We are deeply thankful for all of their contributions.

Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthVol. 130(4)
Boston College (US), Boston University (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Leeds (GB), Utrecht University (NL), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), Laboratoire de Géologie de l’École Normale Supérieure (FR), Ehime University (JP), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Rice University (US), The University of Tokyo (JP), University of Newcastle Australia (AU), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.