Analysis Track Condition Trends Through Sensor Data and Clustering Techniques

Railway safety is critical for urban and suburban transit, where increasing train frequency, capacity, and speed heighten operational risks. This study uses sensor data, including velocity, latitude, longitude, and acceleration, from Bandung commuter lines between August 2023 and July 2024 to analyze track conditions with clustering techniques. K-Means with k=2 grouped tracks into two categories. Cluster 0 consists of winding, longer tracks with higher average velocity and acceleration, indicating complex and higher-risk routes. Cluster 1 includes shorter, straighter tracks with lower velocity and acceleration, reflecting safer conditions. A comparative analysis with Gaussian Mixture Models confirmed K-Means' effectiveness, achieving a silhouette score of 0.480. The findings highlight the need for interventions such as speed limits and increased monitoring on high-risk tracks, while safer routes require fewer measures. This approach demonstrates how clustering can support proactive railway safety management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icitsi65188.2024.10929378
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis Track Condition Trends Through Sensor Data and Clustering Techniques

Faqih Hamami, Sinung Suakanto, Nurul Fitri Aliyah
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

Analysis Track Condition Trends Through Sensor Data and Clustering Techniques

Faqih Hamami, Sinung Suakanto, Nurul Fitri Aliyah
article en

Abstract

Railway safety is critical for urban and suburban transit, where increasing train frequency, capacity, and speed heighten operational risks. This study uses sensor data, including velocity, latitude, longitude, and acceleration, from Bandung commuter lines between August 2023 and July 2024 to analyze track conditions with clustering techniques. K-Means with k=2 grouped tracks into two categories. Cluster 0 consists of winding, longer tracks with higher average velocity and acceleration, indicating complex and higher-risk routes. Cluster 1 includes shorter, straighter tracks with lower velocity and acceleration, reflecting safer conditions. A comparative analysis with Gaussian Mixture Models confirmed K-Means' effectiveness, achieving a silhouette score of 0.480. The findings highlight the need for interventions such as speed limits and increased monitoring on high-risk tracks, while safer routes require fewer measures. This approach demonstrates how clustering can support proactive railway safety management.

Telkom University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis Track Condition Trends Through Sensor Data and Clustering Techniques — Faqih Hamami, Sinung Suakanto, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS