Genetic variation in novel calf traits using a farmer-centered, co-design approach to data collection

Improving calf health on dairy farms contributes to animal welfare and business productivity gains. In recent years, traditional genetic evaluations have broadened to include cow health traits that have economic importance. Calf health is a new frontier to explore, but new traits require sufficient data to be effectively evaluated. Researchers who work in countries without obligatory recordkeeping systems, commonly promote the need to significantly improve recordkeeping practices to enable research, benchmarking, and genetic evaluation, as is the case in Australia. The aim of this study was to estimate variance components for novel calf traits using a dataset that was co-designed with farmers and included calf identity, calving ease, health records, and genotypes. Almost 20,000 calf records from more than 50 farms located throughout Australia were collected between 2020 and 2023. In Holstein calves, the mean ± SE prevalence of preweaning mortality (PWM) and scours, were 0.020 ± 0.001 and 0.059 ± 0.002, respectively. A newly defined and subjectively scored trait called calf vitality was co-developed with farmers, where 21% of calves were classed in the top category of vigorous or "ripper," 54% were good or average, 6% were "duds," and 19% of scored calves died. Univariate linear models that included a genomic relationship matrix were used to estimate variance components for diseases and vitality, where h<sup>2</sup> values were between 1% and 11% in Holsteins, depending on the trait. The models included herd-year-season, sex, parity group, and calving ease (Holstein only) as fixed effects and these were found to be significant for most breed and trait combinations. The estimated reliability of EBVs ranged between 0.2 and 0.3. In Australia, Holsteins are more numerous than the Jersey breed, and so despite efforts to compile an appropriate dataset, the disease prevalence and record numbers were too low to report genetic variance for calf health traits in the Jersey breed. Approximate genetic correlations with other calf health traits such as stillbirth and PWM were modest but favorable. There were few significant correlations with lactating cow traits (such as survival, SCC, and likeability) and national selection indexes that are routinely evaluated in Australia and those that were significant were in a favorable direction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-26011
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic variation in novel calf traits using a farmer-centered, co-design approach to data collection

J.E. Pryce, M. Haile‐Mariam, Amanda J. Chamberlain, Majid Khansefid et al.
3 citations
Journal of Dairy Science
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
5.45
article

Genetic variation in novel calf traits using a farmer-centered, co-design approach to data collection

J.E. Pryce, M. Haile‐Mariam, Amanda J. Chamberlain, Majid Khansefid, Michelle Axford, Michael E. Goddard
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Improving calf health on dairy farms contributes to animal welfare and business productivity gains. In recent years, traditional genetic evaluations have broadened to include cow health traits that have economic importance. Calf health is a new frontier to explore, but new traits require sufficient data to be effectively evaluated. Researchers who work in countries without obligatory recordkeeping systems, commonly promote the need to significantly improve recordkeeping practices to enable research, benchmarking, and genetic evaluation, as is the case in Australia. The aim of this study was to estimate variance components for novel calf traits using a dataset that was co-designed with farmers and included calf identity, calving ease, health records, and genotypes. Almost 20,000 calf records from more than 50 farms located throughout Australia were collected between 2020 and 2023. In Holstein calves, the mean ± SE prevalence of preweaning mortality (PWM) and scours, were 0.020 ± 0.001 and 0.059 ± 0.002, respectively. A newly defined and subjectively scored trait called calf vitality was co-developed with farmers, where 21% of calves were classed in the top category of vigorous or "ripper," 54% were good or average, 6% were "duds," and 19% of scored calves died. Univariate linear models that included a genomic relationship matrix were used to estimate variance components for diseases and vitality, where h<sup>2</sup> values were between 1% and 11% in Holsteins, depending on the trait. The models included herd-year-season, sex, parity group, and calving ease (Holstein only) as fixed effects and these were found to be significant for most breed and trait combinations. The estimated reliability of EBVs ranged between 0.2 and 0.3. In Australia, Holsteins are more numerous than the Jersey breed, and so despite efforts to compile an appropriate dataset, the disease prevalence and record numbers were too low to report genetic variance for calf health traits in the Jersey breed. Approximate genetic correlations with other calf health traits such as stillbirth and PWM were modest but favorable. There were few significant correlations with lactating cow traits (such as survival, SCC, and likeability) and national selection indexes that are routinely evaluated in Australia and those that were significant were in a favorable direction.

Journal of Dairy ScienceVol. 108(6)
La Trobe University (AU), Agriculture Victoria (AU), AgriBio (AU), Agriculture Victoria Services (Australia) (AU)
Dairy Australia, Gardiner Foundation, La Trobe University, Agriculture Victoria
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
5.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.