Gentleness, Spiritedness, and Choosing an Interlocutor in Plato

Abstract Plato, across several dialogues, praises a combination of spiritedness and gentleness and criticizes an imbalance between these two traits. Unsurprisingly, we see Plato warn against excessively spirited interlocutors in the Republic and Philebus; surprisingly, the Visitor in the Sophist prefers an only gentle interlocutor. This paper argues that we can explain this preference by considering aim in philosophical discussion. Through exploring the relation between gentleness and spiritedness and several main aims, this paper emphasizes how Plato was concerned about mapping philosophical aim onto types of interlocutors, and considered traits such as these important in choosing an interlocutor for philosophical discussion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History of Philosophy Quarterly
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5406/21521026.41.4.03
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gentleness, Spiritedness, and Choosing an Interlocutor in Plato

Marta Heckel
History of Philosophy Quarterly
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

Gentleness, Spiritedness, and Choosing an Interlocutor in Plato

Marta Heckel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Plato, across several dialogues, praises a combination of spiritedness and gentleness and criticizes an imbalance between these two traits. Unsurprisingly, we see Plato warn against excessively spirited interlocutors in the Republic and Philebus; surprisingly, the Visitor in the Sophist prefers an only gentle interlocutor. This paper argues that we can explain this preference by considering aim in philosophical discussion. Through exploring the relation between gentleness and spiritedness and several main aims, this paper emphasizes how Plato was concerned about mapping philosophical aim onto types of interlocutors, and considered traits such as these important in choosing an interlocutor for philosophical discussion.

History of Philosophy QuarterlyVol. 41(4)
University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.