ANALOGY IN THE APPLICATION OF RULES OF QUALIFICATION OF CRIMES

According to Part 2 of Article 3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the application of criminal law by analogy is not allowed. In this regard, the question arises: does this norm extend to the rules for qualifying crimes? The purpose of this article is to determine whether it is permissible to apply the rules for qualifying crimes by analogy. Before answering this question, the author used the classification of rules for qualifying crimes, depending on their source of origin, into normative and non-normative, developed in Russian criminal law science. An intermediate conclusion is made that the legislative ban on the application of analogy applies mainly to protective rules of criminal law that provide for a certain type of behavior and the corresponding legal consequences. The article emphasizes the regulatory nature of the few rules of criminal law that provide for the rules for its application. In this regard, the author comes to the final conclusion that the ban on analogy does not extend to normative rules for qualifying crimes. There is also no legislative ban on the application of non-normative rules for qualifying crimes formulated in the doctrine of criminal law or in the resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
LEGAL ORDER History Theory Practice
Published
2025-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47475/2311-696x-2025-44-1-80-83
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Evidence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANALOGY IN THE APPLICATION OF RULES OF QUALIFICATION OF CRIMES

Maxim V. Morozov
1 citations
LEGAL ORDER History Theory Practice
Criminal Law and Evidence
15.98
article

ANALOGY IN THE APPLICATION OF RULES OF QUALIFICATION OF CRIMES

Maxim V. Morozov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

According to Part 2 of Article 3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the application of criminal law by analogy is not allowed. In this regard, the question arises: does this norm extend to the rules for qualifying crimes? The purpose of this article is to determine whether it is permissible to apply the rules for qualifying crimes by analogy. Before answering this question, the author used the classification of rules for qualifying crimes, depending on their source of origin, into normative and non-normative, developed in Russian criminal law science. An intermediate conclusion is made that the legislative ban on the application of analogy applies mainly to protective rules of criminal law that provide for a certain type of behavior and the corresponding legal consequences. The article emphasizes the regulatory nature of the few rules of criminal law that provide for the rules for its application. In this regard, the author comes to the final conclusion that the ban on analogy does not extend to normative rules for qualifying crimes. There is also no legislative ban on the application of non-normative rules for qualifying crimes formulated in the doctrine of criminal law or in the resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.

LEGAL ORDER History Theory PracticeVol. 44(1)
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Criminal Law and Evidence
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.