Choosing tight-binding models for accurate optoelectronic responses

Tight-binding models provide great insight and are a low-cost alternative to ab initio methods for calculation of a material's electronic structure. These models are used to calculate optical responses, including nonlinear optical effects such as the shift current bulk photovoltaic effect. The validity of tight-binding models is often evaluated by comparing their band structures to those calculated with density functional theory. However, we find that band structure agreement is a necessary but not sufficient condition for accurate optical response calculations. We compute the shift current response and dielectric tensor using a variety of tight-binding models of ${\text{MoS}}_{2}$, including both Slater-Koster and Wannier tight-binding models that treat the Mo $4d$ orbitals and/or S $3p$ orbitals. We also truncate hoppings in the Wannier function models to next-nearest-neighbor, as is common in tight-binding methods, in order to gauge the effect on optical response. By examining discrepancies in energies and optical matrix elements, we determine the interpolation quality of the different tight-binding models and establish that agreement in both band structure and wave functions is required to accurately model optical response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.111.125203
Citations
5
Primary Topic
GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Choosing tight-binding models for accurate optoelectronic responses

Andrew M. Rappe, Aaron M. Schankler, A. P. Ghosh
5 citations
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
6.29
article

Choosing tight-binding models for accurate optoelectronic responses

Andrew M. Rappe, Aaron M. Schankler, A. P. Ghosh
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Tight-binding models provide great insight and are a low-cost alternative to ab initio methods for calculation of a material's electronic structure. These models are used to calculate optical responses, including nonlinear optical effects such as the shift current bulk photovoltaic effect. The validity of tight-binding models is often evaluated by comparing their band structures to those calculated with density functional theory. However, we find that band structure agreement is a necessary but not sufficient condition for accurate optical response calculations. We compute the shift current response and dielectric tensor using a variety of tight-binding models of ${\text{MoS}}_{2}$, including both Slater-Koster and Wannier tight-binding models that treat the Mo $4d$ orbitals and/or S $3p$ orbitals. We also truncate hoppings in the Wannier function models to next-nearest-neighbor, as is common in tight-binding methods, in order to gauge the effect on optical response. By examining discrepancies in energies and optical matrix elements, we determine the interpolation quality of the different tight-binding models and establish that agreement in both band structure and wave functions is required to accurately model optical response.

Physical review. B./Physical review. BVol. 111(12)
California University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
6.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.