Global climate changes decoupled soil nitrogen mineralization and immobilization

Global change factors (GCFs), including elevated CO 2 (eCO 2 ), warming, increased precipitation (eP), drought, and nitrogen (N) deposition, and their combination have profoundly affected soil N cycling. Despite extensive research, critical gaps remain in understanding GCF effects on soil N mineralization-immobilization turnover (MIT), particularly the individual and interactive effects of GCFs on gross mineralization (GM), immobilization (GI), ammonium immobilization (GIA), and nitrate immobilization (GIN) rates. We conducted a meta-analysis using 631 paired field observations to evaluate the responses of GM, GI, GIA, and GIN to individual and combined GCFs. The results showed that among the examined individual and combined GCFs, 75 % had positive effects on GM, 12.5 % were neutral, and 12.5 % were negative. In contrast, none of the examined GCFs had positive impact on GI, with 50 % showing no effect, and 50 % displaying negative effect. The overall effect of individual GCFs on GM was significantly positive (effect size: 0.312), while their effect on GI was negative (−0.211). Combined GCFs had a significantly positive effect on GM (0.224) but negative effect on GI (−0.756). These findings demonstrate, for the first time, that GCFs may widen the difference between GM and GI, potentially increasing soil available N production. Furthermore, the responses of GI to GCFs showed less sensitivity than that of GM to variations in ecosystems, soil horizons, and climatic zones , likely due to the opposite responses of GIA and GIN to GCFs. Soil properties (e.g., pH and total C) emerged as the primary drivers of GM and GI responses to GCFs, and GCFs duration was also underscored to improve the prediction of soil N cycling under concurrent GCFs. By addressing the research gap in soil N MIT dynamics, our findings enhance the understanding of soil N availability and its implications for ecosystem functioning under future climates. • GCFs decouple soil N mineralization-immobilization, increasing available N in bare soils. • Gross N immobilization rates are less sensitive to GCFs than mineralization rates. • Ammonium and nitrate immobilization rates exhibit opposing responses to GCFs. • Soil properties are the most reliable predictors in the response of gross N transformation rates to GCFs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109794
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global climate changes decoupled soil nitrogen mineralization and immobilization

Christoph Müller, Ahmed Salah Elrys, Yi Zhang, Jinbo Zhang et al.
5 citations
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
5.93
article

Global climate changes decoupled soil nitrogen mineralization and immobilization

Christoph Müller, Ahmed Salah Elrys, Yi Zhang, Jinbo Zhang, Siwen Du, Weihong Jiang, Zucong Cai
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Global change factors (GCFs), including elevated CO 2 (eCO 2 ), warming, increased precipitation (eP), drought, and nitrogen (N) deposition, and their combination have profoundly affected soil N cycling. Despite extensive research, critical gaps remain in understanding GCF effects on soil N mineralization-immobilization turnover (MIT), particularly the individual and interactive effects of GCFs on gross mineralization (GM), immobilization (GI), ammonium immobilization (GIA), and nitrate immobilization (GIN) rates. We conducted a meta-analysis using 631 paired field observations to evaluate the responses of GM, GI, GIA, and GIN to individual and combined GCFs. The results showed that among the examined individual and combined GCFs, 75 % had positive effects on GM, 12.5 % were neutral, and 12.5 % were negative. In contrast, none of the examined GCFs had positive impact on GI, with 50 % showing no effect, and 50 % displaying negative effect. The overall effect of individual GCFs on GM was significantly positive (effect size: 0.312), while their effect on GI was negative (−0.211). Combined GCFs had a significantly positive effect on GM (0.224) but negative effect on GI (−0.756). These findings demonstrate, for the first time, that GCFs may widen the difference between GM and GI, potentially increasing soil available N production. Furthermore, the responses of GI to GCFs showed less sensitivity than that of GM to variations in ecosystems, soil horizons, and climatic zones , likely due to the opposite responses of GIA and GIN to GCFs. Soil properties (e.g., pH and total C) emerged as the primary drivers of GM and GI responses to GCFs, and GCFs duration was also underscored to improve the prediction of soil N cycling under concurrent GCFs. By addressing the research gap in soil N MIT dynamics, our findings enhance the understanding of soil N availability and its implications for ecosystem functioning under future climates. • GCFs decouple soil N mineralization-immobilization, increasing available N in bare soils. • Gross N immobilization rates are less sensitive to GCFs than mineralization rates. • Ammonium and nitrate immobilization rates exhibit opposing responses to GCFs. • Soil properties are the most reliable predictors in the response of gross N transformation rates to GCFs.

Soil Biology and BiochemistryVol. 206
University College Dublin (IE), Nanjing Normal University (CN), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), Hainan University (CN), Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application (CN), Sanya University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
5.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.