Are Breaks Always Helpful? The Interaction of Work Breaks and Working Memory Capacity on Accounting Error Detection<sup>*</sup>

ABSTRACT Accounting review tasks undertaken by supervisors are crucial in the discovery of discrepancies. Most individuals believe that in this context the majority of breaks taken are beneficial, rather than harmful, to work performance. This study explores the improvement that breaks can bring to accounting tasks and how individuals' working memory capacity (WMC) moderates the relationship between breaks and task performance. Through an experiment, we find that when breaks are assessed together with WMC, low‐WMC participants who took a break between tasks did not perform better on a review task than those who did not take a break. Break‐taking was most beneficial to review task performance for individuals with high WMC. Although prior break research has mostly been studied in a blue‐collar setting, exploring the impact of breaks on performance in an accounting setting is important as psychology research findings do not always translate into this context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting Perspectives
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12400
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Breaks Always Helpful? The Interaction of Work Breaks and Working Memory Capacity on Accounting Error Detection*

Xin Geng, Alyssa S. J. Ong, David Aizenberg
Accounting Perspectives
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Are Breaks Always Helpful? The Interaction of Work Breaks and Working Memory Capacity on Accounting Error Detection*

Xin Geng, Alyssa S. J. Ong, David Aizenberg
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Accounting review tasks undertaken by supervisors are crucial in the discovery of discrepancies. Most individuals believe that in this context the majority of breaks taken are beneficial, rather than harmful, to work performance. This study explores the improvement that breaks can bring to accounting tasks and how individuals' working memory capacity (WMC) moderates the relationship between breaks and task performance. Through an experiment, we find that when breaks are assessed together with WMC, low‐WMC participants who took a break between tasks did not perform better on a review task than those who did not take a break. Break‐taking was most beneficial to review task performance for individuals with high WMC. Although prior break research has mostly been studied in a blue‐collar setting, exploring the impact of breaks on performance in an accounting setting is important as psychology research findings do not always translate into this context.

Accounting PerspectivesVol. 24(3)
Pepperdine University (US), Berry College (US)
Pepperdine University
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.