Fragmentation of Legal Texts and its Impact on Reducing the Correct Meaning

This research aims to show the real function of semantics and their effect in deducing meanings from texts. The origin of texts is semantic integration between them, and each text is complementary to the other, to reach the correct acceptable meaning. It is a process of linking obtained through multiple perspectives in which the meanings of the texts are combined together to be one product. This matter saves the texts from opposition and conflict between them. This appears clearly from following the methods of inference and deduction and the controls of understanding the texts, as they all urge the mujtahid and the reader of the legal texts to link between them and not to extract from the texts a meaning that suits him, because in that there is potential to distort the text.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
KnE Social Sciences
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i6.18277
Primary Topic
Legal and Regulatory Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fragmentation of Legal Texts and its Impact on Reducing the Correct Meaning

Suhaib Abbas Odeh Al-Kubaisi, Ahmed Khatal Mukhlif Al-Obaidi
KnE Social Sciences
Legal and Regulatory Analysis
article

Fragmentation of Legal Texts and its Impact on Reducing the Correct Meaning

Suhaib Abbas Odeh Al-Kubaisi, Ahmed Khatal Mukhlif Al-Obaidi
article en

Abstract

This research aims to show the real function of semantics and their effect in deducing meanings from texts. The origin of texts is semantic integration between them, and each text is complementary to the other, to reach the correct acceptable meaning. It is a process of linking obtained through multiple perspectives in which the meanings of the texts are combined together to be one product. This matter saves the texts from opposition and conflict between them. This appears clearly from following the methods of inference and deduction and the controls of understanding the texts, as they all urge the mujtahid and the reader of the legal texts to link between them and not to extract from the texts a meaning that suits him, because in that there is potential to distort the text.

KnE Social SciencesVol. 10(6)
University of Anbar (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Legal and Regulatory Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.