Light emitting diode (LED) light as an alternative to fluorescent for whole effluent toxicity (WET) organism reference toxicity testing and culturing

In the global transition from fluorescent to light emitting diode (LED) lights, there has been limited research to determine the impact of different light types on whole effluent toxicity (WET) test organisms. This study compared WET testing results, using sodium chloride as the reference toxicant, for Ceriodaphnia dubia, Daphnia magna, Daphnia pulex, and Pimephales promelas kept under fluorescent and LED lights. Inter-laboratory comparisons were made for acute and chronic C. dubia, acute D. pulex, and acute D. magna test results, where seasonality impacts were determined for all tests. One laboratory further evaluated culturing board effects over 12-week periods for C. dubia and D. magna and compared different LED light temperatures for C. dubia. Time of year differences were found with inconsistencies observed between laboratories. LED light temperature did not affect C. dubia culturing or WET test performance. In conclusion, LED lights are a viable alternative to fluorescent in WET testing except for chronic P. promelas and potentially chronic D. magna testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf081
Primary Topic
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Light emitting diode (LED) light as an alternative to fluorescent for whole effluent toxicity (WET) organism reference toxicity testing and culturing

Jennifer L. Bouldin, A.F. Romero, Orithea Z. Regn
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
article

Light emitting diode (LED) light as an alternative to fluorescent for whole effluent toxicity (WET) organism reference toxicity testing and culturing

Jennifer L. Bouldin, A.F. Romero, Orithea Z. Regn
article en

Abstract

In the global transition from fluorescent to light emitting diode (LED) lights, there has been limited research to determine the impact of different light types on whole effluent toxicity (WET) test organisms. This study compared WET testing results, using sodium chloride as the reference toxicant, for Ceriodaphnia dubia, Daphnia magna, Daphnia pulex, and Pimephales promelas kept under fluorescent and LED lights. Inter-laboratory comparisons were made for acute and chronic C. dubia, acute D. pulex, and acute D. magna test results, where seasonality impacts were determined for all tests. One laboratory further evaluated culturing board effects over 12-week periods for C. dubia and D. magna and compared different LED light temperatures for C. dubia. Time of year differences were found with inconsistencies observed between laboratories. LED light temperature did not affect C. dubia culturing or WET test performance. In conclusion, LED lights are a viable alternative to fluorescent in WET testing except for chronic P. promelas and potentially chronic D. magna testing.

Environmental Toxicology and ChemistryVol. 44(7)
Arkansas State University (US), GEI Consultants (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.