Massive Inter-species Introgression Overwhelms Phylogenomic Relationships Among Jaguar, Lion, and Leopard

Phylogenomic analyses of closely related species allow important glimpses into their evolutionary history. Although recent studies have demonstrated that inter-species hybridization has occurred in several groups, incorporating this process in phylogenetic reconstruction remains challenging. Specifically, the most predominant topology across the genome is often assumed to reflect the speciation tree, but rampant hybridization might overwhelm the genomes, causing that assumption to be violated. The notoriously challenging phylogeny of the 5 extant Panthera species (specifically jaguar [P. onca], lion [P. leo], and leopard [P. pardus]) is an interesting system to address this problem. Here we employed a Panthera-wide whole-genome-sequence data set incorporating 3 jaguar genomes and 2 representatives of lions and leopards to dissect the relationships among these 3 species. Maximum-likelihood trees reconstructed from non-overlapping genomic fragments of 4 different sizes strongly supported the monophyly of all 3 species. The most frequent topology (76-95%) united lion + leopard as a sister species (topology 1), followed by lion + jaguar (topology 2: 4-8%) and leopard + jaguar (topology 3: 0-6%). Topology 1 was dominant across the genome, especially in high-recombination regions. Topologies 2 and 3 were enriched in low-recombination segments, likely reflecting the species tree in the face of hybridization. Divergence times between sister species of each topology, corrected for local-recombination-rate effects, indicated that the lion-leopard divergence was significantly younger than the alternatives, likely driven by post-speciation admixture. Introgression analyses detected pervasive hybridization between lions and leopards, regardless of the assumed species tree. This inference was strongly supported by multispecies-coalescence-with-introgression analyses, which rejected topology 1 (lion+leopard) or any model without introgression. Interestingly, topologies 2 (lion+jaguar) and 3 (jaguar+leopard) with extensive lion-leopard introgression were unidentifiable, highlighting the complexity of this phylogenetic problem. Our results suggest that the dominant genome-wide tree topology is not the true species tree but rather a consequence of overwhelming post-speciation admixture between lion and leopard.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systematic Biology
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaf021
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Massive Inter-species Introgression Overwhelms Phylogenomic Relationships Among Jaguar, Lion, and Leopard

William J. Murphy, Laury Cullen, Henrique Vieira Figueiró, Tomáš Flouri et al.
7 citations
Systematic Biology
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
5.64
article

Massive Inter-species Introgression Overwhelms Phylogenomic Relationships Among Jaguar, Lion, and Leopard

William J. Murphy, Laury Cullen, Henrique Vieira Figueiró, Tomáš Flouri, Eduardo Eizirik, Sarah Helen Dias dos Santos, Ziheng Yang, Emiliano Esterci Ramalho
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Phylogenomic analyses of closely related species allow important glimpses into their evolutionary history. Although recent studies have demonstrated that inter-species hybridization has occurred in several groups, incorporating this process in phylogenetic reconstruction remains challenging. Specifically, the most predominant topology across the genome is often assumed to reflect the speciation tree, but rampant hybridization might overwhelm the genomes, causing that assumption to be violated. The notoriously challenging phylogeny of the 5 extant Panthera species (specifically jaguar [P. onca], lion [P. leo], and leopard [P. pardus]) is an interesting system to address this problem. Here we employed a Panthera-wide whole-genome-sequence data set incorporating 3 jaguar genomes and 2 representatives of lions and leopards to dissect the relationships among these 3 species. Maximum-likelihood trees reconstructed from non-overlapping genomic fragments of 4 different sizes strongly supported the monophyly of all 3 species. The most frequent topology (76-95%) united lion + leopard as a sister species (topology 1), followed by lion + jaguar (topology 2: 4-8%) and leopard + jaguar (topology 3: 0-6%). Topology 1 was dominant across the genome, especially in high-recombination regions. Topologies 2 and 3 were enriched in low-recombination segments, likely reflecting the species tree in the face of hybridization. Divergence times between sister species of each topology, corrected for local-recombination-rate effects, indicated that the lion-leopard divergence was significantly younger than the alternatives, likely driven by post-speciation admixture. Introgression analyses detected pervasive hybridization between lions and leopards, regardless of the assumed species tree. This inference was strongly supported by multispecies-coalescence-with-introgression analyses, which rejected topology 1 (lion+leopard) or any model without introgression. Interestingly, topologies 2 (lion+jaguar) and 3 (jaguar+leopard) with extensive lion-leopard introgression were unidentifiable, highlighting the complexity of this phylogenetic problem. Our results suggest that the dominant genome-wide tree topology is not the true species tree but rather a consequence of overwhelming post-speciation admixture between lion and leopard.

Systematic BiologyVol. 74(4)
Western University (CA), Vale (Brazil) (BR), Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas (BR), Instituto Pró-Carnívoros (BR), Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá (BR), University College London (GB), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Texas A&M University (US)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
5.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.