A Comprehensive Evaluation of Analytical Method Parameters Critical to the Reliable Assessment of Therapeutic mRNA Integrity by Capillary Gel Electrophoresis

In recent years, messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-lipid nanoparticle (LNP) biotherapeutics have demonstrated significant promise in disease treatment and prevention given their rapidly modifiable production processes and considerable capacity to adapt to complex or low-yielding proteins of interest. As a result, many products are currently being developed in this space. Critically, well-characterized and appropriately designed assays are required to monitor purity and integrity in order to maintain the efficacy and consistency of these novel products. Currently, capillary gel electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence (CGE-LIF) and ion-pair reversed-phase liquid chromatography (IP-RPLC) are techniques of choice for mRNA integrity analysis. However, most methods proposed for biotherapeutic analysis have been developed using naked mRNA without LNP components or proprietary buffer formulations, which can obscure undiscovered impurities or complex interactions between mRNA and the sample matrix. In this study, we addressed these methodological challenges by using a biotherapeutically relevant commercial mRNA-LNP sample (approx. 4200 b) to refine and optimize a customizable CGE-LIF method currently under consideration for mRNA-LNP biotherapeutic analysis. We systematically characterized how critical method parameters-such as denaturant type, concentration, and usage-and LNP disruption protocols can interfere with accurate mRNA integrity analysis in CGE-LIF and IP-RPLC. We found that optimal conditions for CGE-LIF assay sensitivity, variability, and resolution included sample precipitation by isopropanol, high urea concentrations, no formamide as a sample diluent, and high concentrations of dye. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of both CGE-LIF and IP-RPLC are highlighted, and a discussion of key considerations when using or designing methods for mRNA integrity assessment is presented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electrophoresis
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.8123
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Analytical Method Parameters Critical to the Reliable Assessment of Therapeutic mRNA Integrity by Capillary Gel Electrophoresis

Barry Lorbetskie, Casey Lansdell, Huixin Lu, Xuguang Li et al.
5 citations
Electrophoresis
Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
3.37
article

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Analytical Method Parameters Critical to the Reliable Assessment of Therapeutic mRNA Integrity by Capillary Gel Electrophoresis

Barry Lorbetskie, Casey Lansdell, Huixin Lu, Xuguang Li, Jun Gao, Jessica P. Tran, Michael Johnston, Lisheng Wang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

In recent years, messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-lipid nanoparticle (LNP) biotherapeutics have demonstrated significant promise in disease treatment and prevention given their rapidly modifiable production processes and considerable capacity to adapt to complex or low-yielding proteins of interest. As a result, many products are currently being developed in this space. Critically, well-characterized and appropriately designed assays are required to monitor purity and integrity in order to maintain the efficacy and consistency of these novel products. Currently, capillary gel electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence (CGE-LIF) and ion-pair reversed-phase liquid chromatography (IP-RPLC) are techniques of choice for mRNA integrity analysis. However, most methods proposed for biotherapeutic analysis have been developed using naked mRNA without LNP components or proprietary buffer formulations, which can obscure undiscovered impurities or complex interactions between mRNA and the sample matrix. In this study, we addressed these methodological challenges by using a biotherapeutically relevant commercial mRNA-LNP sample (approx. 4200 b) to refine and optimize a customizable CGE-LIF method currently under consideration for mRNA-LNP biotherapeutic analysis. We systematically characterized how critical method parameters-such as denaturant type, concentration, and usage-and LNP disruption protocols can interfere with accurate mRNA integrity analysis in CGE-LIF and IP-RPLC. We found that optimal conditions for CGE-LIF assay sensitivity, variability, and resolution included sample precipitation by isopropanol, high urea concentrations, no formamide as a sample diluent, and high concentrations of dye. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of both CGE-LIF and IP-RPLC are highlighted, and a discussion of key considerations when using or designing methods for mRNA integrity assessment is presented.

ElectrophoresisVol. 46(7-8)
Health Canada (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), Carleton University (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
3.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.