Maintaining the use of telehealth for delivering rehabilitation services in a regional hospital post-COVID19: Learning from telehealth delivery rates and staff experiences

ObjectiveTo examine what delivery format had been used to facilitate rehabilitation services over recent years and to identify barriers and enablers to using telehealth in the future.DesignMultiple method research approach.Setting:Outpatient rehabilitation service in a large regional hospital in Australia.Participants:Clinicians that deliver rehabilitation interventions including allied health professionals and nurses.Main measuresFirst, a retrospective audit of data examining the rate of telehealth use. Second, semi-structured focus groups with clinical staff to identify barriers and enablers to using telehealth. Data were thematically analysed and mapped to a behaviour change framework.ResultsPre-pandemic, 82% (n = 45,960) of rehabilitation services were delivered in-person; during peak restrictions, in-person delivery was 54% (n = 49,337). Following the ease of restrictions, 71% (n = 49,337) of the rehabilitation services were delivered in-person, 28% (n = 21,624) via phone and 1% (n = 493) via video. Telehealth use increased 11% from pre-pandemic to when restrictions were eased, driven by increased use of phone consultations. Six themes related to barriers and four themes related enablers to using telehealth were identified. Using the behaviour change framework, five interventions functions (education, training, environmental restructure, modelling and enablement) were recommended to facilitate telehealth use.ConclusionsTelehealth-delivered rehabilitation rates increased post-pandemic, primarily via phone consultations. Reported barriers and enablers highlight the need for targeted strategies, with five intervention functions identified that may support increased telehealth adoption in rehabilitation settings. Future efforts should address clinician-raised barriers to optimise telehealth integration into service delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251326050
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maintaining the use of telehealth for delivering rehabilitation services in a regional hospital post-COVID19: Learning from telehealth delivery rates and staff experiences

Stephen Barrett, Owen Howlett, Tracy Harnetty
2 citations
Clinical Rehabilitation
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
3.76
article

Maintaining the use of telehealth for delivering rehabilitation services in a regional hospital post-COVID19: Learning from telehealth delivery rates and staff experiences

Stephen Barrett, Owen Howlett, Tracy Harnetty
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ObjectiveTo examine what delivery format had been used to facilitate rehabilitation services over recent years and to identify barriers and enablers to using telehealth in the future.DesignMultiple method research approach.Setting:Outpatient rehabilitation service in a large regional hospital in Australia.Participants:Clinicians that deliver rehabilitation interventions including allied health professionals and nurses.Main measuresFirst, a retrospective audit of data examining the rate of telehealth use. Second, semi-structured focus groups with clinical staff to identify barriers and enablers to using telehealth. Data were thematically analysed and mapped to a behaviour change framework.ResultsPre-pandemic, 82% (n = 45,960) of rehabilitation services were delivered in-person; during peak restrictions, in-person delivery was 54% (n = 49,337). Following the ease of restrictions, 71% (n = 49,337) of the rehabilitation services were delivered in-person, 28% (n = 21,624) via phone and 1% (n = 493) via video. Telehealth use increased 11% from pre-pandemic to when restrictions were eased, driven by increased use of phone consultations. Six themes related to barriers and four themes related enablers to using telehealth were identified. Using the behaviour change framework, five interventions functions (education, training, environmental restructure, modelling and enablement) were recommended to facilitate telehealth use.ConclusionsTelehealth-delivered rehabilitation rates increased post-pandemic, primarily via phone consultations. Reported barriers and enablers highlight the need for targeted strategies, with five intervention functions identified that may support increased telehealth adoption in rehabilitation settings. Future efforts should address clinician-raised barriers to optimise telehealth integration into service delivery.

Clinical RehabilitationVol. 39(5)
Bendigo Health (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Maintaining the use of telehealth for delivering rehabilitation services in a regional hospital post-COVID19: Learning from telehealth delivery rates and staff experiences — Stephen Barrett, Owen Howlett, et al. · Clinical Rehabilitation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS