Detection of <i>KRAS</i> Mutations Using Extracellular Vesicle <scp>DNA</scp> in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Liquid biopsy using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is useful for precision medicine and molecular-guided oncology; however, its sensitivity is insufficient. We focused on DNA in extracellular vesicles (evDNA) as a new target for liquid biopsy and investigated its sensitivity. This observational study included 334 Stage I-IV colorectal cancer patients. evDNAs and ctDNAs were extracted from plasma collected before surgery. KRAS mutation status was analyzed using droplet digital PCR. One hundred and forty-eight patients had KRAS mutations in tumor tissues, and 186 patients had no KRAS mutations. In Stage II (Stage II 37.8% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.015) or III (Stage III 43.1% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.001) patients, sensitivities to detect KRAS mutations using evDNA were higher than those using ctDNA. Surprisingly, evDNA identified KRAS mutations in 13.8% of patients who lacked them in tumor tissue samples. Among Stage III patients, those with higher concentrations of evDNA had significantly poorer relapse-free survival compared with those who had lower concentrations of evDNA (p = 0.043). The use of evDNA improved the identification rate of KRAS mutations. By using evDNA, KRAS mutations were identified in more than 10% of patients without KRAS mutations in their tumor tissues. The concentration of evDNA can be a prognostic factor for Stage III colorectal cancer patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Science
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.70059
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Extracellular vesicles in disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detection of KRAS Mutations Using Extracellular Vesicle DNA in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Akihisa Matsuda, Hiromichi Sonoda, Hiroshi Yoshida, Kohji Ueda et al.
8 citations
Cancer Science
Extracellular vesicles in disease
6.45
article

Detection of KRAS Mutations Using Extracellular Vesicle DNA in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Akihisa Matsuda, Hiromichi Sonoda, Hiroshi Yoshida, Kohji Ueda, Takuma Iwai, Shintaro Kanaka, Takeshi Nagasaka, Toshimitsu Miyasaka, Ryo Ohta, Kohki Takeda, Seiichi Shinji, Sho Kuriyama, Takeshi Yamada, Goro Takahashi, Yasuyuki Yokoyama, Keisuke Uehara
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Liquid biopsy using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is useful for precision medicine and molecular-guided oncology; however, its sensitivity is insufficient. We focused on DNA in extracellular vesicles (evDNA) as a new target for liquid biopsy and investigated its sensitivity. This observational study included 334 Stage I-IV colorectal cancer patients. evDNAs and ctDNAs were extracted from plasma collected before surgery. KRAS mutation status was analyzed using droplet digital PCR. One hundred and forty-eight patients had KRAS mutations in tumor tissues, and 186 patients had no KRAS mutations. In Stage II (Stage II 37.8% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.015) or III (Stage III 43.1% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.001) patients, sensitivities to detect KRAS mutations using evDNA were higher than those using ctDNA. Surprisingly, evDNA identified KRAS mutations in 13.8% of patients who lacked them in tumor tissue samples. Among Stage III patients, those with higher concentrations of evDNA had significantly poorer relapse-free survival compared with those who had lower concentrations of evDNA (p = 0.043). The use of evDNA improved the identification rate of KRAS mutations. By using evDNA, KRAS mutations were identified in more than 10% of patients without KRAS mutations in their tumor tissues. The concentration of evDNA can be a prognostic factor for Stage III colorectal cancer patients.

Cancer ScienceVol. 116(6)
Kawasaki Medical School (JP), Nippon Medical School (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Extracellular vesicles in disease
6.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.