An integrated assessment model for cost-effective long-term decarbonization pathways in China's iron and steel industry

Decarbonization in the iron and steel industry is critical for climate action and sustainable development . Existing research on cost-effective decarbonization technologies is limited, often overlooking optimal multi-technology strategies that balance decarbonization and economic feasibility . We developed an integrated assessment model to optimize long-term decarbonization strategies by evaluating low-carbon technologies based on decarbonization costs, penetration rates, payback times , service life, and benefit-cost ratio. The model aims to identify optimal dynamic development pathways for a series of decarbonization technologies up to 2035, minimizing both costs and carbon emissions through scenarios prioritizing emissions or costs. Under optimal pathways, the aggregate technology decarbonization potential and dynamic trends in industry CO 2 emission intensity and costs were analyzed. We examined the impacts of changes in key input parameters, leading to variable multi-technology dynamic development pathways. Our findings indicate that decarbonization costs for BF-BOF (Blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace) and EAF (Electric arc furnace) technologies range from −-0.5 to 0.4 yuan/kgCO 2 and -0.3 to −0.02 yuan/kgCO 2 , demonstrating high economic viability under higher carbon prices. Optimal development pathways suggest significant annual changes within BF-BOF and EAF routes, classifying technologies by cumulative decarbonization potential into advanced, moderate, and conservative categories. Future CO 2 emission intensities decrease more significantly in the EAF route, indicating a higher decarbonization capacity, while total costs increased annually due to rising emission costs and declining energy costs. The optimal multi-technology dynamic development pathways are influenced by production routes, carbon prices, and energy supply modes, with cleaner energy reducing the need for aggressive decarbonization technology adoption. • Integrated model identifying decarbonization pathways in China's iron industry. • TEA analysis based on economic and environmental benefits and technology maturity. • Optimal pathways minimize costs and emissions till 2035 by technology combination. • Advanced, moderate and conservative technology classifications in optimal pathways. • EAF shows higher decarbonization capacity and significant CO 2 intensity reduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115639
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An integrated assessment model for cost-effective long-term decarbonization pathways in China's iron and steel industry

Chenghang Zheng, Xiang Luo, Qingyang Lin, Hanxiao Liu et al.
5 citations
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
3.57
article

An integrated assessment model for cost-effective long-term decarbonization pathways in China's iron and steel industry

Chenghang Zheng, Xiang Luo, Qingyang Lin, Hanxiao Liu, Xiang Gao, Ying Wang, Yuxin Yan, Tao Wu
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Decarbonization in the iron and steel industry is critical for climate action and sustainable development . Existing research on cost-effective decarbonization technologies is limited, often overlooking optimal multi-technology strategies that balance decarbonization and economic feasibility . We developed an integrated assessment model to optimize long-term decarbonization strategies by evaluating low-carbon technologies based on decarbonization costs, penetration rates, payback times , service life, and benefit-cost ratio. The model aims to identify optimal dynamic development pathways for a series of decarbonization technologies up to 2035, minimizing both costs and carbon emissions through scenarios prioritizing emissions or costs. Under optimal pathways, the aggregate technology decarbonization potential and dynamic trends in industry CO 2 emission intensity and costs were analyzed. We examined the impacts of changes in key input parameters, leading to variable multi-technology dynamic development pathways. Our findings indicate that decarbonization costs for BF-BOF (Blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace) and EAF (Electric arc furnace) technologies range from −-0.5 to 0.4 yuan/kgCO 2 and -0.3 to −0.02 yuan/kgCO 2 , demonstrating high economic viability under higher carbon prices. Optimal development pathways suggest significant annual changes within BF-BOF and EAF routes, classifying technologies by cumulative decarbonization potential into advanced, moderate, and conservative categories. Future CO 2 emission intensities decrease more significantly in the EAF route, indicating a higher decarbonization capacity, while total costs increased annually due to rising emission costs and declining energy costs. The optimal multi-technology dynamic development pathways are influenced by production routes, carbon prices, and energy supply modes, with cleaner energy reducing the need for aggressive decarbonization technology adoption. • Integrated model identifying decarbonization pathways in China's iron industry. • TEA analysis based on economic and environmental benefits and technology maturity. • Optimal pathways minimize costs and emissions till 2035 by technology combination. • Advanced, moderate and conservative technology classifications in optimal pathways. • EAF shows higher decarbonization capacity and significant CO 2 intensity reduction.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVol. 216
University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN), Zhejiang University of Science and Technology (CN), Zhejiang Energy Group (China) (CN), Baidu (China) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
3.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.