Model Optimization and Data Analysis Methods for Low-Temperature CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub> Adsorption Experiments on Carbonaceous Materials

Low-temperature gas adsorption experiments are widely utilized to evaluate the pore structures of porous materials. Understanding the applicability of each model in different types of samples is crucial, as these models can yield diverse interpretations of pore structures from identical experimental data. In this study, low-temperature CO2/N2 isothermal adsorption experiments were conducted on coal, shale, and activated carbon samples to compare and analyze the suitability of each model in different samples and pore size ranges. The key findings are as follows. (1) Low-temperature CO2/N2 adsorption experiments provide insight into pore volume, specific surface area, and pore size distribution ranging from 0.36 to 160 nm in coal, shale, and activated carbon pores. (2) The CO2-DFT model is applicable for analyzing the low-temperature CO2 adsorption experiments in all samples. For the analysis of pores smaller than 35 nm in the low-temperature N2 adsorption experiment, the slit hole nonlocal density functional theory model is recommended for middle-rank coal and the slit/cylindrical Quench Solid Density Functional Theory adsorption branch model for high-rank coal, shale, and activated carbon samples. For pore size larger than 35 nm, the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda model is recommended to analyzing the adsorption branches. (3) For overlapping pore interval of the different model’s analysis results, the CO2-DFT model is recommended for the range of 1.41–1.47 nm, and the N2-DFT model is recommended for the range of 4.14–36.00 nm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c00142
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model Optimization and Data Analysis Methods for Low-Temperature CO2 and N2 Adsorption Experiments on Carbonaceous Materials

Dangyu Song, Jienan Pan, Yingquan Zhai, Guoqin Wei et al.
1 citations
Energy & Fuels
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
0.86
article

Model Optimization and Data Analysis Methods for Low-Temperature CO2 and N2 Adsorption Experiments on Carbonaceous Materials

Dangyu Song, Jienan Pan, Yingquan Zhai, Guoqin Wei, Ziyi Wang, Yunbo Li, Xiaowei Shi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Low-temperature gas adsorption experiments are widely utilized to evaluate the pore structures of porous materials. Understanding the applicability of each model in different types of samples is crucial, as these models can yield diverse interpretations of pore structures from identical experimental data. In this study, low-temperature CO2/N2 isothermal adsorption experiments were conducted on coal, shale, and activated carbon samples to compare and analyze the suitability of each model in different samples and pore size ranges. The key findings are as follows. (1) Low-temperature CO2/N2 adsorption experiments provide insight into pore volume, specific surface area, and pore size distribution ranging from 0.36 to 160 nm in coal, shale, and activated carbon pores. (2) The CO2-DFT model is applicable for analyzing the low-temperature CO2 adsorption experiments in all samples. For the analysis of pores smaller than 35 nm in the low-temperature N2 adsorption experiment, the slit hole nonlocal density functional theory model is recommended for middle-rank coal and the slit/cylindrical Quench Solid Density Functional Theory adsorption branch model for high-rank coal, shale, and activated carbon samples. For pore size larger than 35 nm, the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda model is recommended to analyzing the adsorption branches. (3) For overlapping pore interval of the different model’s analysis results, the CO2-DFT model is recommended for the range of 1.41–1.47 nm, and the N2-DFT model is recommended for the range of 4.14–36.00 nm.

Energy & FuelsVol. 39(13)
Henan Academy of Sciences (CN), Culture Resource (EG), Henan Polytechnic University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.