A Cross-Jurisdictional Analysis of Competition Law Perspectives from The Eu, Us, And India.

Competition law governs markets by forestalling monopolistic behavior, encouraging fair competition, and safeguarding consumer interests. With growing digital markets, there has been increased concern regarding Big Tech dominance, data monopolies, and anti-competitive takeovers. This paper contrasts competition law regimes in the EU, US, and India based on their legal systems, enforcement mechanisms, and methods for regulating digital platforms. Major legislative frameworks are the Sherman Act (1890), Clayton Act (1914), and FTC Act (1914) in the US; Articles 101 and 102 of the TFEU in the EU; and India's Competition Act (2002). The EU adopts a strict interventionist approach, the US is market efficiency-oriented, and India combines both but has enforcement issues in the digital economy. The research also delves into India's draft Digital Competition Act (DCA), bringing measures to prevent anti-competitive behaviours proactively. Highlighting international cooperation, more challenging merger control, AI-based enforcement, and global regulatory cooperation, the paper urges a competitive and equitable digital economy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i02.39679
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Cross-Jurisdictional Analysis of Competition Law Perspectives from The Eu, Us, And India.

Ganeswar Nath, Raghavendra Naik
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Merger and Competition Analysis
article

A Cross-Jurisdictional Analysis of Competition Law Perspectives from The Eu, Us, And India.

Ganeswar Nath, Raghavendra Naik
article en

Abstract

Competition law governs markets by forestalling monopolistic behavior, encouraging fair competition, and safeguarding consumer interests. With growing digital markets, there has been increased concern regarding Big Tech dominance, data monopolies, and anti-competitive takeovers. This paper contrasts competition law regimes in the EU, US, and India based on their legal systems, enforcement mechanisms, and methods for regulating digital platforms. Major legislative frameworks are the Sherman Act (1890), Clayton Act (1914), and FTC Act (1914) in the US; Articles 101 and 102 of the TFEU in the EU; and India's Competition Act (2002). The EU adopts a strict interventionist approach, the US is market efficiency-oriented, and India combines both but has enforcement issues in the digital economy. The research also delves into India's draft Digital Competition Act (DCA), bringing measures to prevent anti-competitive behaviours proactively. Highlighting international cooperation, more challenging merger control, AI-based enforcement, and global regulatory cooperation, the paper urges a competitive and equitable digital economy.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 7(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Merger and Competition Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Cross-Jurisdictional Analysis of Competition Law Perspectives from The Eu, Us, And India. — Ganeswar Nath, Raghavendra Naik · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS