Scarring and Selection in the Great Irish Famine

Abstract How do famines shape the health of survivors? We examine the long‐term impact of the Great Irish Famine (1845–52) on human stature, distinguishing between adverse scarring effects and the apparent resilience of survivors due to selection. Using anthropometric data from more than 14500 individuals born before, during, and after this famine, we find that selection effects were most pronounced in areas with the highest mortality rates. Individuals born in severely affected regions exhibited no evidence of stunted growth, indicating that the Famine disproportionately eliminated the most vulnerable. In contrast, stunting is observed only in areas with lower excess mortality, where selective pressures were weaker. These findings contribute to debates on the biological consequences of extreme catastrophic risks, demonstrating how selection effects can obscure long‐term health deterioration. More broadly, our study provides a methodological framework for assessing selection in historical anthropometric research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Economic History Review
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.70013
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scarring and Selection in the Great Irish Famine

Matthias Blum, Eoin McLaughlin, Christopher L. Colvin
3 citations
The Economic History Review
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
16.78
article

Scarring and Selection in the Great Irish Famine

Matthias Blum, Eoin McLaughlin, Christopher L. Colvin
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract How do famines shape the health of survivors? We examine the long‐term impact of the Great Irish Famine (1845–52) on human stature, distinguishing between adverse scarring effects and the apparent resilience of survivors due to selection. Using anthropometric data from more than 14500 individuals born before, during, and after this famine, we find that selection effects were most pronounced in areas with the highest mortality rates. Individuals born in severely affected regions exhibited no evidence of stunted growth, indicating that the Famine disproportionately eliminated the most vulnerable. In contrast, stunting is observed only in areas with lower excess mortality, where selective pressures were weaker. These findings contribute to debates on the biological consequences of extreme catastrophic risks, demonstrating how selection effects can obscure long‐term health deterioration. More broadly, our study provides a methodological framework for assessing selection in historical anthropometric research.

The Economic History ReviewVol. 79(1)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), German Medical Association (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
16.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.