Potential Environmental Impact Evaluation of the Methanol Synthesis Process by Gas-to-Methanol Technology

Two methanol production process options based on gas-to-methanol (GTM) technology according to the CO<sub>2</sub> feed location (option 1: CO<sub>2</sub> is fed to the methanol synthesis unit via a reformer; option 2: CO<sub>2</sub> is directly fed to the methanol synthesis unit) are proposed. In this study, we simulated these two methanol synthesis process options at a steam/natural gas (S/NG) ratio of 1.5 and evaluated the environmental impact of the two options by comparing the potential environment impact (PEI) according to the recycle ratio of unreacted syngas. We simulated the process using Aspen Plus and quantitated the PEI rates using the Waste Reduction (WAR) algorithm (version 1.0). The results show that in both cases PEI rates decrease with increasing recycle ratio of the unreacted syngas and thus become environmentally friendly. Also, it was demonstrated that option 1 is more environmentally friendly than option 2, and when the recycle ratio increases from 0 to 0.9, the total rate of PEI output decreases from 176.3 to 93.4 PEI/h by 53.0% and the PEI generation rate decreases from 149.9 to 67.0 PEI/h by 44.7%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c10680
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential Environmental Impact Evaluation of the Methanol Synthesis Process by Gas-to-Methanol Technology

Kyong Song Pak, Hong Yang
2 citations
ACS Omega
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
1.04
article

Potential Environmental Impact Evaluation of the Methanol Synthesis Process by Gas-to-Methanol Technology

Kyong Song Pak, Hong Yang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Two methanol production process options based on gas-to-methanol (GTM) technology according to the CO<sub>2</sub> feed location (option 1: CO<sub>2</sub> is fed to the methanol synthesis unit via a reformer; option 2: CO<sub>2</sub> is directly fed to the methanol synthesis unit) are proposed. In this study, we simulated these two methanol synthesis process options at a steam/natural gas (S/NG) ratio of 1.5 and evaluated the environmental impact of the two options by comparing the potential environment impact (PEI) according to the recycle ratio of unreacted syngas. We simulated the process using Aspen Plus and quantitated the PEI rates using the Waste Reduction (WAR) algorithm (version 1.0). The results show that in both cases PEI rates decrease with increasing recycle ratio of the unreacted syngas and thus become environmentally friendly. Also, it was demonstrated that option 1 is more environmentally friendly than option 2, and when the recycle ratio increases from 0 to 0.9, the total rate of PEI output decreases from 176.3 to 93.4 PEI/h by 53.0% and the PEI generation rate decreases from 149.9 to 67.0 PEI/h by 44.7%.

ACS OmegaVol. 10(13)
Kim Chaek University of Technology (KP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.