Construction of an effectiveness evaluation model for furniture design curriculum reform under the new engineering education paradigm

Purpose: This study develops and validates a comprehensive evaluation model for assessing furniture design curriculum reform effectiveness under the New Engineering Education paradigm, 6 addressing the need for systematic assessment tools in design education transformation.Methodology: The research employs a mixed-methods approach incorporating both quantitative and qualitative analysis. A hierarchical evaluation framework was constructed using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation methods. Data was collected from 324 participants across 12 universities, including faculty members (n=86), students (n=198), and industry experts (n=40), over a three-year implementation period (2021-2024). Results: The evaluation model demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.937) and strong predictive accuracy (MAPE = 3.2%). Statistical analysis revealed significant improvements in student performance metrics (technical competency increased from 65% to 88%) and stakeholder satisfaction (student satisfaction reached 92%, industry satisfaction 88%). Regional implementation variations were identified, with eastern regions achieving 92% implementation rates compared to northern regions at 85%. The model validation process showed strong consistency across different institutional contexts (CV = 0.089). Implications: The study provides a standardized framework for assessing curriculum reform effectiveness, enabling data-driven decision-making in educational program development. The findings offer practical guidelines for institutions implementing new engineering education reforms and valuable insights for policy makers in developing targeted support mechanisms. Limitations: Geographic concentration of the sample and the three-year implementation period may limit generalizability and long-term impact assessment. The predominantly quantitative approach may not fully capture qualitative aspects of educational outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Social Psychology
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i2.3427
Primary Topic
Educational Reforms and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Construction of an effectiveness evaluation model for furniture design curriculum reform under the new engineering education paradigm

Ramir S. Austria, Junfeng Wang
Environment and Social Psychology
Educational Reforms and Innovations
article

Construction of an effectiveness evaluation model for furniture design curriculum reform under the new engineering education paradigm

Ramir S. Austria, Junfeng Wang
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study develops and validates a comprehensive evaluation model for assessing furniture design curriculum reform effectiveness under the New Engineering Education paradigm, 6 addressing the need for systematic assessment tools in design education transformation.Methodology: The research employs a mixed-methods approach incorporating both quantitative and qualitative analysis. A hierarchical evaluation framework was constructed using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation methods. Data was collected from 324 participants across 12 universities, including faculty members (n=86), students (n=198), and industry experts (n=40), over a three-year implementation period (2021-2024). Results: The evaluation model demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.937) and strong predictive accuracy (MAPE = 3.2%). Statistical analysis revealed significant improvements in student performance metrics (technical competency increased from 65% to 88%) and stakeholder satisfaction (student satisfaction reached 92%, industry satisfaction 88%). Regional implementation variations were identified, with eastern regions achieving 92% implementation rates compared to northern regions at 85%. The model validation process showed strong consistency across different institutional contexts (CV = 0.089). Implications: The study provides a standardized framework for assessing curriculum reform effectiveness, enabling data-driven decision-making in educational program development. The findings offer practical guidelines for institutions implementing new engineering education reforms and valuable insights for policy makers in developing targeted support mechanisms. Limitations: Geographic concentration of the sample and the three-year implementation period may limit generalizability and long-term impact assessment. The predominantly quantitative approach may not fully capture qualitative aspects of educational outcomes.

Environment and Social PsychologyVol. 10(2)
University of the Cordilleras (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Educational Reforms and Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Construction of an effectiveness evaluation model for furniture design curriculum reform under the new engineering education paradigm — Ramir S. Austria, Junfeng Wang · Environment and Social Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS