Integrating large language models into medical education: A commentary on opportunities, challenges, and future directions

Shortly following its release in November 2022, OpenAI’s ChatGPT gained notoriety in the medical education community for its ability to perform at or near the passing threshold on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE). Although there is an overwhelming amount of excitement surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) and its potential to revolutionize medical training, this commentary seeks to explore both the opportunities and challenges posed by incorporating large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT into medical education. To evaluate ChatGPT’s impact in the context of problem-based learning (PBL) medical education, we conducted two initial studies. The first study assessed ChatGPT’s performance on concept application exercises (CAEs)—short-answer assessments used in our program to gauge student progress. After establishing ChatGPT’s performance on CAEs, our second study aimed to evaluate ChatGPT’s ability to effectively grade student-generated responses. Our results reveal that ChatGPT not only outperforms students who are marginally passing but also grades these assessments with promising alignment to human grading practices. Our team’s future research plans include examining ChatGPT's ability to provide effective feedback, generate discerning assessment questions, create realistic training scenarios, and support continuous professional development. Although we are optimistic about future applications of LLMs, we emphasize the need for an AI-assisted approach that employs human oversight to mitigate the inherent risks associated with LLMs, such as bias perpetuation, inaccuracies, over-reliance, and potential misuse. Ultimately, through the thoughtful and evidence-based implementation of these new tools, we believe AI can be harnessed to augment rather than undermine the quality and effectiveness of medical education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
McMaster University Medical Journal
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15173/mumj.v21i1.3674
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating large language models into medical education: A commentary on opportunities, challenges, and future directions

Keyna Bracken, Quang Ngo, Anthony J Levinson, Levi Burns et al.
McMaster University Medical Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Integrating large language models into medical education: A commentary on opportunities, challenges, and future directions

Keyna Bracken, Quang Ngo, Anthony J Levinson, Levi Burns, Matthew Sibbald, Leo Morjaria, Mark Lee
article en

Abstract

Shortly following its release in November 2022, OpenAI’s ChatGPT gained notoriety in the medical education community for its ability to perform at or near the passing threshold on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE). Although there is an overwhelming amount of excitement surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) and its potential to revolutionize medical training, this commentary seeks to explore both the opportunities and challenges posed by incorporating large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT into medical education. To evaluate ChatGPT’s impact in the context of problem-based learning (PBL) medical education, we conducted two initial studies. The first study assessed ChatGPT’s performance on concept application exercises (CAEs)—short-answer assessments used in our program to gauge student progress. After establishing ChatGPT’s performance on CAEs, our second study aimed to evaluate ChatGPT’s ability to effectively grade student-generated responses. Our results reveal that ChatGPT not only outperforms students who are marginally passing but also grades these assessments with promising alignment to human grading practices. Our team’s future research plans include examining ChatGPT's ability to provide effective feedback, generate discerning assessment questions, create realistic training scenarios, and support continuous professional development. Although we are optimistic about future applications of LLMs, we emphasize the need for an AI-assisted approach that employs human oversight to mitigate the inherent risks associated with LLMs, such as bias perpetuation, inaccuracies, over-reliance, and potential misuse. Ultimately, through the thoughtful and evidence-based implementation of these new tools, we believe AI can be harnessed to augment rather than undermine the quality and effectiveness of medical education.

McMaster University Medical JournalVol. 21(1)
McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.