Real-life study of the accuracy of tools for assessing fitness to drive after non-progressive acquired brain injury: a multi-centric study protocol (PREVAC study)

Non-progressive acquired brain injury can cause cognitive and behavioral damage. These disorders may hinder the driving abilities of affected individuals, increasing crash risk. Consequently, driving license regulations have required people who suffer from brain injury to be examined by an approved doctor for their driving license to remain valid. The decree of March 28, 2022 requires that approved doctors consider elements of patients' multiprofessional evaluation, but mentions neither the on-road driving assessment nor the neuropsychological assessment. However, these assessments are an integral part of the good practice recommendations certified by the French National Authority for Health. Practitioners in rehabilitation centers are used to applying the main recommendations despite the lack of consensus about the methods and tools used. Given these new regulations and the wide variety of real-life practices, this multicenter study aims to investigate the accuracy of tools for driving skill evaluation to guide professional practices. The cross-sectional study will investigate the sensitivity and specificity of both neuropsychological tests and an on-road assessment grid (Test Ride for Investigating Practical fitness to drive), through concordance analysis between the opinions expressed by professionals and between tools. Then, a cohort study will propose longitudinal follow-up of the drivers at 6 and 12 months in order to determine the predictive performance of the various assessments in terms of road risk, and to explore the relevance of educational support on driving habits and behavior. In this context, the quality of the decision-making process for maintaining a driving license is a major issue in limiting the road risk. As part of the measures issued by the Interministerial Road Safety Committee in 2023 aimed at "better detecting, assessing and monitoring unfitness to drive", this study presents a challenge in terms of supporting public policies. It aims to harmonize the multiprofessional evaluation recently made mandatory, in order to better inform the approved doctor's opinion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1539753
Primary Topic
Older Adults Driving Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-life study of the accuracy of tools for assessing fitness to drive after non-progressive acquired brain injury: a multi-centric study protocol (PREVAC study)

Catherine Gabaude, Pascale Colliot, Clothilde Rosier
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Older Adults Driving Studies
article

Real-life study of the accuracy of tools for assessing fitness to drive after non-progressive acquired brain injury: a multi-centric study protocol (PREVAC study)

Catherine Gabaude, Pascale Colliot, Clothilde Rosier
article en

Abstract

Non-progressive acquired brain injury can cause cognitive and behavioral damage. These disorders may hinder the driving abilities of affected individuals, increasing crash risk. Consequently, driving license regulations have required people who suffer from brain injury to be examined by an approved doctor for their driving license to remain valid. The decree of March 28, 2022 requires that approved doctors consider elements of patients' multiprofessional evaluation, but mentions neither the on-road driving assessment nor the neuropsychological assessment. However, these assessments are an integral part of the good practice recommendations certified by the French National Authority for Health. Practitioners in rehabilitation centers are used to applying the main recommendations despite the lack of consensus about the methods and tools used. Given these new regulations and the wide variety of real-life practices, this multicenter study aims to investigate the accuracy of tools for driving skill evaluation to guide professional practices. The cross-sectional study will investigate the sensitivity and specificity of both neuropsychological tests and an on-road assessment grid (Test Ride for Investigating Practical fitness to drive), through concordance analysis between the opinions expressed by professionals and between tools. Then, a cohort study will propose longitudinal follow-up of the drivers at 6 and 12 months in order to determine the predictive performance of the various assessments in terms of road risk, and to explore the relevance of educational support on driving habits and behavior. In this context, the quality of the decision-making process for maintaining a driving license is a major issue in limiting the road risk. As part of the measures issued by the Interministerial Road Safety Committee in 2023 aimed at "better detecting, assessing and monitoring unfitness to drive", this study presents a challenge in terms of supporting public policies. It aims to harmonize the multiprofessional evaluation recently made mandatory, in order to better inform the approved doctor's opinion.

Frontiers in Human NeuroscienceVol. 19
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Lumière Lyon 2 (FR), Maison des Sciences sociales et des Humanités - Lyon St-Étienne (FR), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), Laboratoire de Psychologie et d’Ergonomie Appliquées (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Older Adults Driving Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.