Inhomogeneous Dust Biases Photometric Redshifts and Stellar Masses for LSST

Abstract Spectral energy distribution (SED) modeling is one of the main methods to estimate galaxy properties, such as photometric redshifts, z , and stellar masses, M * , for extragalactic imaging surveys. SEDs are currently modeled as light from a composite stellar population attenuated by a geometrically homogeneous foreground dust screen. This is despite evidence from simulations and observations that find large spatial variations in dust attenuation due to the detailed geometry of stars and gas within galaxies. In this work, we examine the impact of this simplistic dust assumption on inferred z and M * for Rubin LSST. We first construct synthetic LSST-like observations ( ugrizy magnitudes) from the Numerical Investigation of Hundred Astrophysical Objects (NIHAO)-SKIRT catalog, which provides SEDs from high-resolution hydrodynamic simulations using 3D Monte Carlo radiative transfer. We then infer z and M * from the synthetic observations using the PROVABGS Bayesian SED modeling framework. Overall, the homogeneous dust screen assumption biases both z and M * in galaxies, consistently and significantly for galaxies with dust attenuation A V ≳ 0.5, and likely below. The biases depend on the orientation in which the galaxies are observed. At z = 0.4, z is overestimated by ∼0.02 for face-on galaxies and M * is underestimated by ∼0.4 dex for edge-on galaxies. The bias in photo- z is equivalent to the desired redshift precision level of the LSST “gold sample” and will be larger at higher redshifts. Our results underscore the need for SED models with additional flexibility in the dust parameterization to mitigate significant systematic biases in cosmological analyses with LSST.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/adbe5e
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inhomogeneous Dust Biases Photometric Redshifts and Stellar Masses for LSST

ChangHoon Hahn, P. Melchior
2 citations
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
2.31
article

Inhomogeneous Dust Biases Photometric Redshifts and Stellar Masses for LSST

ChangHoon Hahn, P. Melchior
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Spectral energy distribution (SED) modeling is one of the main methods to estimate galaxy properties, such as photometric redshifts, z , and stellar masses, M * , for extragalactic imaging surveys. SEDs are currently modeled as light from a composite stellar population attenuated by a geometrically homogeneous foreground dust screen. This is despite evidence from simulations and observations that find large spatial variations in dust attenuation due to the detailed geometry of stars and gas within galaxies. In this work, we examine the impact of this simplistic dust assumption on inferred z and M * for Rubin LSST. We first construct synthetic LSST-like observations ( ugrizy magnitudes) from the Numerical Investigation of Hundred Astrophysical Objects (NIHAO)-SKIRT catalog, which provides SEDs from high-resolution hydrodynamic simulations using 3D Monte Carlo radiative transfer. We then infer z and M * from the synthetic observations using the PROVABGS Bayesian SED modeling framework. Overall, the homogeneous dust screen assumption biases both z and M * in galaxies, consistently and significantly for galaxies with dust attenuation A V ≳ 0.5, and likely below. The biases depend on the orientation in which the galaxies are observed. At z = 0.4, z is overestimated by ∼0.02 for face-on galaxies and M * is underestimated by ∼0.4 dex for edge-on galaxies. The bias in photo- z is equivalent to the desired redshift precision level of the LSST “gold sample” and will be larger at higher redshifts. Our results underscore the need for SED models with additional flexibility in the dust parameterization to mitigate significant systematic biases in cosmological analyses with LSST.

The Astrophysical Journal LettersVol. 982(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Inhomogeneous Dust Biases Photometric Redshifts and Stellar Masses for LSST — ChangHoon Hahn, P. Melchior · The Astrophysical Journal Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS