Machine Learning-Based Classification of Coronary Heart Disease: A Comparative Analysis of Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine Models

The accurate and early detection of coronary heart disease (CHD) is crucial for reducing mortality rates.This study evaluates the predictive performance of three machine learning models-Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)-for classifying CHD.The models were trained on a comprehensive heart disease dataset and assessed using metrics such as Accuracy, Specificity, Sensitivity, F1-score, Negative Predictive Value, and Positive Predictive Value.Among the models, RF demonstrated the highest accuracy (93.5%), while SVM excelled in sensitivity (97.5%).The findings highlight the potential of machine learning techniques in clinical decision-making and personalized medicine.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
OALib
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1113054
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
32.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-Based Classification of Coronary Heart Disease: A Comparative Analysis of Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine Models

Salma Akter, Zakia Sultana Munmun, Chowdhury Raihan Parvez
11 citations
OALib
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
32.31
article

Machine Learning-Based Classification of Coronary Heart Disease: A Comparative Analysis of Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine Models

Salma Akter, Zakia Sultana Munmun, Chowdhury Raihan Parvez
article en
11 citations

Abstract

The accurate and early detection of coronary heart disease (CHD) is crucial for reducing mortality rates.This study evaluates the predictive performance of three machine learning models-Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)-for classifying CHD.The models were trained on a comprehensive heart disease dataset and assessed using metrics such as Accuracy, Specificity, Sensitivity, F1-score, Negative Predictive Value, and Positive Predictive Value.Among the models, RF demonstrated the highest accuracy (93.5%), while SVM excelled in sensitivity (97.5%).The findings highlight the potential of machine learning techniques in clinical decision-making and personalized medicine.

OALibVol. 12(03)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
32.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.