Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Two Silver-Containing Dressings in the Treatment of Deep Partial-Thickness Thermal Burns: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial

<b>Aims/Background</b> Silver-containing dressings are commonly utilized in burns treatment by virtue of their excellent antibacterial properties. Further research is needed to determine the type of silver-containing dressing that is more effective and safer for burns treatment. Pyperbranched polyamide-Ag dressing (HBPs-Ag dressing) is a modified polyamide dressing with a uniform coating of the Amino-terminated hyperbranched polymer (HBP-NH<sub>2</sub>)/Ag<sup>+</sup> compound on its surface. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a silver ion-containing dressing (HBPs-Ag) for wound contact layer in the treatment of deep partial-thickness burns versus a silver-impregnated tulle dressing (Atrauman Ag). <b>Methods</b> This study was conducted between October 2019 to January 2021 at six sites in China. A total of 132 patients with deep partial-thickness burns (aged 18-65 years, injury occurring within 72 hours, burns <30% total burn surface area) were randomized 1:1 to HBPs-Ag group (study group) or Atrauman Ag group (control group). Data were obtained and analyzed, including total efficacy, wound healing rate, wound healing time, rate of negative bacterial culture from wound secretions, systemic response, skin or tissue irritation, local skin color changes, wound swelling, wound pain and adverse events. <b>Results</b> For partial thickness burns, the HBPs-Ag dressing was not inferior to Atrauman Ag dressing because the total efficiency of HBPs-Ag group (98.3%) was comparable to that of Atrauman Ag group (94.7%) (<i>p</i> > 0.05). There were no significant differences in efficacy, wound healing rate, wound healing time, and rate of negative bacterial culture from wound secretions between the two groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). There were no statistical differences in all safety indicators tested between the two groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Silver was detected in the blood or urine of only 5 patients (3.79%). <b>Conclusion</b> The HBPs-Ag dressing was not inferior to Atrauman Ag dressing in deep partial-thickness burns treatment, with both of them showcasing comparable efficacy and safety. <b>Clinical Trial Registration</b> Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100049814).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Hospital Medicine
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0218
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Two Silver-Containing Dressings in the Treatment of Deep Partial-Thickness Thermal Burns: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial

ZiQing Ye, Gang Yu, Zhongzhi Zhou, Meijun Jiang et al.
British Journal of Hospital Medicine
Wound Healing and Treatments
article

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Two Silver-Containing Dressings in the Treatment of Deep Partial-Thickness Thermal Burns: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial

ZiQing Ye, Gang Yu, Zhongzhi Zhou, Meijun Jiang, Weiguo Xie, Danguang Liu, Shuhua Liu, Wenjun Liu, Wei Zhang, Jun Zheng, Zhengjun Cui
article en

Abstract

<b>Aims/Background</b> Silver-containing dressings are commonly utilized in burns treatment by virtue of their excellent antibacterial properties. Further research is needed to determine the type of silver-containing dressing that is more effective and safer for burns treatment. Pyperbranched polyamide-Ag dressing (HBPs-Ag dressing) is a modified polyamide dressing with a uniform coating of the Amino-terminated hyperbranched polymer (HBP-NH<sub>2</sub>)/Ag<sup>+</sup> compound on its surface. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a silver ion-containing dressing (HBPs-Ag) for wound contact layer in the treatment of deep partial-thickness burns versus a silver-impregnated tulle dressing (Atrauman Ag). <b>Methods</b> This study was conducted between October 2019 to January 2021 at six sites in China. A total of 132 patients with deep partial-thickness burns (aged 18-65 years, injury occurring within 72 hours, burns <30% total burn surface area) were randomized 1:1 to HBPs-Ag group (study group) or Atrauman Ag group (control group). Data were obtained and analyzed, including total efficacy, wound healing rate, wound healing time, rate of negative bacterial culture from wound secretions, systemic response, skin or tissue irritation, local skin color changes, wound swelling, wound pain and adverse events. <b>Results</b> For partial thickness burns, the HBPs-Ag dressing was not inferior to Atrauman Ag dressing because the total efficiency of HBPs-Ag group (98.3%) was comparable to that of Atrauman Ag group (94.7%) (<i>p</i> > 0.05). There were no significant differences in efficacy, wound healing rate, wound healing time, and rate of negative bacterial culture from wound secretions between the two groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). There were no statistical differences in all safety indicators tested between the two groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Silver was detected in the blood or urine of only 5 patients (3.79%). <b>Conclusion</b> The HBPs-Ag dressing was not inferior to Atrauman Ag dressing in deep partial-thickness burns treatment, with both of them showcasing comparable efficacy and safety. <b>Clinical Trial Registration</b> Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100049814).

British Journal of Hospital MedicineVol. 86(3)
Kunming Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Tongren Hospital (CN), The Second Nanning People's Hospital (CN), Wuhan Third Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China (CN), Xian Yang Central Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (CN), University of South China (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Wound Healing and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.