‘Doing’ eligibility through income thresholds: Organisational practices in US financial assistance programmes for women with breast cancer

Many financial assistance programmes that target low-income individuals use income thresholds to determine eligibility. Eligibility serves as a critical interface between service applicants and providers, yet eligibility remains undertheorised in the policy literature. Drawing on interviews I conducted with both breast cancer survivors and providers of a range of health-related services, I focus on how organisations make income relevant for access to their services. This making-relevant-for-access is what I conceptualise as ‘doing’ eligibility. Eligibility is thus not a pre-existing status; it emerges through organisational practices. And when these practices change, who becomes eligible changes as well. I explore how different organisations ‘do’ eligibility through income thresholds. Focusing on processes for determining eligibility, rather than categories of eligible individuals, provides new insights into how disparities may be produced and reproduced through seemingly objective work practices such as the calculation of income thresholds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Social Policy
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183251324117
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Doing’ eligibility through income thresholds: Organisational practices in US financial assistance programmes for women with breast cancer

Deborah Lefkowitz
1 links
Critical Social Policy
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

‘Doing’ eligibility through income thresholds: Organisational practices in US financial assistance programmes for women with breast cancer

Deborah Lefkowitz
article en

Abstract

Many financial assistance programmes that target low-income individuals use income thresholds to determine eligibility. Eligibility serves as a critical interface between service applicants and providers, yet eligibility remains undertheorised in the policy literature. Drawing on interviews I conducted with both breast cancer survivors and providers of a range of health-related services, I focus on how organisations make income relevant for access to their services. This making-relevant-for-access is what I conceptualise as ‘doing’ eligibility. Eligibility is thus not a pre-existing status; it emerges through organisational practices. And when these practices change, who becomes eligible changes as well. I explore how different organisations ‘do’ eligibility through income thresholds. Focusing on processes for determining eligibility, rather than categories of eligible individuals, provides new insights into how disparities may be produced and reproduced through seemingly objective work practices such as the calculation of income thresholds.

Critical Social PolicyVol. 45(4)
University of California System (US)
National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘Doing’ eligibility through income thresholds: Organisational practices in US financial assistance programmes for women with breast cancer — Deborah Lefkowitz · Critical Social Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS