The Learn Together programme (part A): co-designing an approach to support patient and family involvement and engagement in patient safety incident investigations

Our ten common principles and co-designed guidance emphasise two key things. First, that organizational learning is not the only desired outcome for incident investigations, with patients, families and staff reporting the need for restoration and repair. Second, that investigations can be part of reparation, but when it fails to address the needs of stakeholders arising from investigations, it can compound the harm of the original incident. As a result, we juxtapose existing theories, and illuminate new insights, proposing a theory of "restorative learning". We see design as an ongoing phenomenon-the guidance is our current iteration, and we learnt several valuable lessons about doing co-design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Health Services
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1529035
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Learn Together programme (part A): co-designing an approach to support patient and family involvement and engagement in patient safety incident investigations

Chris Redford, Rebecca Partridge, Justin Waring, Gemma Louch et al.
3 citations
Frontiers in Health Services
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
6.92
article

The Learn Together programme (part A): co-designing an approach to support patient and family involvement and engagement in patient safety incident investigations

Chris Redford, Rebecca Partridge, Justin Waring, Gemma Louch, Jane O’Hara, Ruth Simms‐Ellis, Joe Langley, Penny Phillips, Laura Sheard, Siobhán McHugh, Lauren Ramsey
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Our ten common principles and co-designed guidance emphasise two key things. First, that organizational learning is not the only desired outcome for incident investigations, with patients, families and staff reporting the need for restoration and repair. Second, that investigations can be part of reparation, but when it fails to address the needs of stakeholders arising from investigations, it can compound the harm of the original incident. As a result, we juxtapose existing theories, and illuminate new insights, proposing a theory of "restorative learning". We see design as an ongoing phenomenon-the guidance is our current iteration, and we learnt several valuable lessons about doing co-design.

Frontiers in Health ServicesVol. 5
University of Leeds (GB), Loughborough University (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), University of York (GB), Sheffield Hallam University (GB), Leeds Beckett University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
6.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Learn Together programme (part A): co-designing an approach to support patient and family involvement and engagement in patient safety incident investigations — Chris Redford, Rebecca Partridge, et al. · Frontiers in Health Services (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS