Intelligent deepwater energy development: Flow assurance monitoring and smart decision-making system

<p>Deepwater hydrocarbon resources (oil, gas, and hydrate) constitute an important part of the world's existing and emerging energy landscape. The high hydrostatic pressure, low temperature, and complex geological structures of deepwater environments present significant challenges for energy development. The development of flow assurance monitoring and intelligent decision-making systems to quantify the risk of hydrate blockage is a prerequisite for safe and efficient development. In this work, the hydrate growth and blockage under varying liquid loading, pump speed, pipe inclination, subcooling, and oil-water ratio were investigated using a high-pressure visual flow loop. A database containing 27 sets of tests with about 510,000 pieces of data was created. The evolution of differential pressure in oil-gas-water-hydrate multiphase flow was found to have two stages. Stage I, differential pressure remains stable or rises slightly with increasing hydrate concentration. Stage II, differential pressure changes abruptly after the hydrate reaches the critical concentration. Therefore, the prediction of hydrate blockage was defined as an unsupervised anomaly detection problem. The Transformer-LSTM-VAE (TLV) blockage prediction model was developed based on the Variational Auto-Encoder framework. The Transformer and LSTM models were utilized as encoder and decoder, respectively. Two uneven weight adjustment methods were proposed to achieve earlier warnings of blockage. In systematic comparisons with three classic and two state-of-the-art machine learning models, the TLV model consistently performed the best with an F1-score of 0.969. The TLV model demonstrated the potential of deep learning methods in deepwater energy development.</p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Innovation Energy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2025.100081
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intelligent deepwater energy development: Flow assurance monitoring and smart decision-making system

Lunxiang Zhang, Yongchen Song, Kang‐Ren Jin, Linhe Wang et al.
5 citations
The Innovation Energy
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
4.30
article

Intelligent deepwater energy development: Flow assurance monitoring and smart decision-making system

Lunxiang Zhang, Yongchen Song, Kang‐Ren Jin, Linhe Wang, Haiyuan Yao, Bo Jiang, Jiguang Wang, Bowen Yang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<p>Deepwater hydrocarbon resources (oil, gas, and hydrate) constitute an important part of the world's existing and emerging energy landscape. The high hydrostatic pressure, low temperature, and complex geological structures of deepwater environments present significant challenges for energy development. The development of flow assurance monitoring and intelligent decision-making systems to quantify the risk of hydrate blockage is a prerequisite for safe and efficient development. In this work, the hydrate growth and blockage under varying liquid loading, pump speed, pipe inclination, subcooling, and oil-water ratio were investigated using a high-pressure visual flow loop. A database containing 27 sets of tests with about 510,000 pieces of data was created. The evolution of differential pressure in oil-gas-water-hydrate multiphase flow was found to have two stages. Stage I, differential pressure remains stable or rises slightly with increasing hydrate concentration. Stage II, differential pressure changes abruptly after the hydrate reaches the critical concentration. Therefore, the prediction of hydrate blockage was defined as an unsupervised anomaly detection problem. The Transformer-LSTM-VAE (TLV) blockage prediction model was developed based on the Variational Auto-Encoder framework. The Transformer and LSTM models were utilized as encoder and decoder, respectively. Two uneven weight adjustment methods were proposed to achieve earlier warnings of blockage. In systematic comparisons with three classic and two state-of-the-art machine learning models, the TLV model consistently performed the best with an F1-score of 0.969. The TLV model demonstrated the potential of deep learning methods in deepwater energy development.</p>

The Innovation EnergyVol. 2(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
4.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.