Psychophysical evidence for an internal model of gravity in the visual and vestibular estimates of vertical motion duration

The motion of objects and ourselves along the vertical is affected by gravitational acceleration. However, the visual system is poorly sensitive to accelerations, and the otolith organs do not disassociate gravitational and inertial accelerations. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the brain estimates the duration of vertical visual motion and self-motion by means of an internal model of gravity predicting that downward motions are accelerated and upward motions are decelerated by gravity. In visual sessions, a target moved up or down while participants remained stationary. In vestibular sessions, participants were moved up or down in the absence of a visual target. In visual-vestibular sessions, participants were moved up or down while the visual target remained fixed in space. In all sessions, we verified that participants looked straight-ahead. We found that downward motions of either the visual target or the participant were systematically perceived as lasting less than upward motions of the same duration, and vice-versa for the opposite direction of motion, consistent with the predictions of the internal model of gravity. In visual-vestibular sessions, there was no significant difference in the average estimates of duration of downward and upward motion of the participant. However, there was large inter-subject variability of these estimates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94512-1
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychophysical evidence for an internal model of gravity in the visual and vestibular estimates of vertical motion duration

Francesco Lacquaniti, Barbara La Scaleia, Myrka Zago, Sergio Delle Monache et al.
4 citations
Scientific Reports
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
5.72
article

Psychophysical evidence for an internal model of gravity in the visual and vestibular estimates of vertical motion duration

Francesco Lacquaniti, Barbara La Scaleia, Myrka Zago, Sergio Delle Monache, Alessandro Finazzi Agrò
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The motion of objects and ourselves along the vertical is affected by gravitational acceleration. However, the visual system is poorly sensitive to accelerations, and the otolith organs do not disassociate gravitational and inertial accelerations. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the brain estimates the duration of vertical visual motion and self-motion by means of an internal model of gravity predicting that downward motions are accelerated and upward motions are decelerated by gravity. In visual sessions, a target moved up or down while participants remained stationary. In vestibular sessions, participants were moved up or down in the absence of a visual target. In visual-vestibular sessions, participants were moved up or down while the visual target remained fixed in space. In all sessions, we verified that participants looked straight-ahead. We found that downward motions of either the visual target or the participant were systematically perceived as lasting less than upward motions of the same duration, and vice-versa for the opposite direction of motion, consistent with the predictions of the internal model of gravity. In visual-vestibular sessions, there was no significant difference in the average estimates of duration of downward and upward motion of the participant. However, there was large inter-subject variability of these estimates.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of Trento (IT), Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
5.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.