Risk perception, seroprevalence, and real-time PCR detection of Brucella among pyretic patients and domestic animals in Kwara State, Nigeria

Brucellosis is a neglected, reportable, and under-reported zoonosis that poses a significant public health challenge in endemic countries like Nigeria. In this study, the risk perception was assessed and 103 pyretic patients from three local government areas of Kwara State, Nigeria were screened by using Rose Bengal plate test (RBPT) and confirmed the analytical sensitivity through real-time PCR (qPCR). We further screened 150 cattle and 52 goats from within a 1-km radius of pyretic patients to determine disease burden in domestic animal reservoirs. Our findings revealed that most of the farmers have heard of brucellosis (89.3%, n = 92/103) while 38.8% (n = 40/103) reported they could identify the symptoms of brucellosis in their herds. The most important risk factors were the consumption of raw milk (92.2%, n = 95/103) and animal abortion within the last year (19.4%, n = 20/103). Also, most study participants (94.2%, n = 97/103) did not believe that they could be infected with the disease. The seroprevalence of brucellosis in humans was 5.8% (n = 6/103) and there was 100% concordance between the results of the RBPT and qPCR in humans. The seroprevalence was 18% and 25% in cattle and goats respectively. The qPCR revealed a lower prevalence rate of 11.3% and 15.4% in cattle and goats respectively. There was high discordance in sensitivity between the RBPT and qPCR in animal samples screened, although both tests had an analytical specificity of 100%. There was no association between awareness and positivity for brucellosis among the study participants and none of the sociodemographic variables significantly influenced the brucellosis positivity rate of humans. Public health physicians and community health workers should consider brucellosis as a differential diagnosis when clerking pyretic patients. In addition, we advocate for mass animal vaccinations and public education with an emphasis on identified risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94970-7
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk perception, seroprevalence, and real-time PCR detection of Brucella among pyretic patients and domestic animals in Kwara State, Nigeria

Nusirat Elelu, Ismail Ayoade Odetokun, Ahmad I. Al-Mustapha, Nwachukwu Raymond Chinedu et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
4.71
article

Risk perception, seroprevalence, and real-time PCR detection of Brucella among pyretic patients and domestic animals in Kwara State, Nigeria

Nusirat Elelu, Ismail Ayoade Odetokun, Ahmad I. Al-Mustapha, Nwachukwu Raymond Chinedu, Bilqees A. Yakub-Obalowu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Brucellosis is a neglected, reportable, and under-reported zoonosis that poses a significant public health challenge in endemic countries like Nigeria. In this study, the risk perception was assessed and 103 pyretic patients from three local government areas of Kwara State, Nigeria were screened by using Rose Bengal plate test (RBPT) and confirmed the analytical sensitivity through real-time PCR (qPCR). We further screened 150 cattle and 52 goats from within a 1-km radius of pyretic patients to determine disease burden in domestic animal reservoirs. Our findings revealed that most of the farmers have heard of brucellosis (89.3%, n = 92/103) while 38.8% (n = 40/103) reported they could identify the symptoms of brucellosis in their herds. The most important risk factors were the consumption of raw milk (92.2%, n = 95/103) and animal abortion within the last year (19.4%, n = 20/103). Also, most study participants (94.2%, n = 97/103) did not believe that they could be infected with the disease. The seroprevalence of brucellosis in humans was 5.8% (n = 6/103) and there was 100% concordance between the results of the RBPT and qPCR in humans. The seroprevalence was 18% and 25% in cattle and goats respectively. The qPCR revealed a lower prevalence rate of 11.3% and 15.4% in cattle and goats respectively. There was high discordance in sensitivity between the RBPT and qPCR in animal samples screened, although both tests had an analytical specificity of 100%. There was no association between awareness and positivity for brucellosis among the study participants and none of the sociodemographic variables significantly influenced the brucellosis positivity rate of humans. Public health physicians and community health workers should consider brucellosis as a differential diagnosis when clerking pyretic patients. In addition, we advocate for mass animal vaccinations and public education with an emphasis on identified risks.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Ilorin (NG), University of Ibadan (NG), Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (NG)
International Foundation for Science
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
4.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.