Analyzing ChatGPT's Problem-solving Capabilities in Arabic-Based Software tasks

This study investigates the problem of ChatGPT’s performance in generating and optimizing Python code in both English and Arabic, addressing the challenges of low-resource languages. The objective is to compare how ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4.0 handle standard algorithms-Linear Search, Binary Search, and Quick Sort in terms of code generation, optimization, and readability. Using a comparative experimental design, key performance metrics such as time complexity, execution speed, and error rates were analyzed. The results reveal substantial disparities between the two languages: English exhibited efficient code generation, minimal errors, and improved optimization, while Arabic encountered higher error rates, slower execution, and limited performance gains despite optimization. These findings highlight the limitations of AI models in low-resource linguistic environments, underscoring the need for fine-tuning to enhance global applicability. This study contributes to advancing the understanding of AI coding tools and their ability to support diverse linguistic contexts, particularly in underrepresented languages like Arabic.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i23s.3766
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing ChatGPT's Problem-solving Capabilities in Arabic-Based Software tasks

Hani Al-Bloush
Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management
AI in Service Interactions
article

Analyzing ChatGPT's Problem-solving Capabilities in Arabic-Based Software tasks

Hani Al-Bloush
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the problem of ChatGPT’s performance in generating and optimizing Python code in both English and Arabic, addressing the challenges of low-resource languages. The objective is to compare how ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4.0 handle standard algorithms-Linear Search, Binary Search, and Quick Sort in terms of code generation, optimization, and readability. Using a comparative experimental design, key performance metrics such as time complexity, execution speed, and error rates were analyzed. The results reveal substantial disparities between the two languages: English exhibited efficient code generation, minimal errors, and improved optimization, while Arabic encountered higher error rates, slower execution, and limited performance gains despite optimization. These findings highlight the limitations of AI models in low-resource linguistic environments, underscoring the need for fine-tuning to enhance global applicability. This study contributes to advancing the understanding of AI coding tools and their ability to support diverse linguistic contexts, particularly in underrepresented languages like Arabic.

Journal of Information Systems Engineering & ManagementVol. 10(23s)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analyzing ChatGPT's Problem-solving Capabilities in Arabic-Based Software tasks — Hani Al-Bloush · Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS