Key requirements for adventure tourism: a comparative study of Ecuador and Costa Rica

This study aimed to compare the factors influencing the requirements for adventure tourism among Costa Rican and Ecuadorian tourists after the COVID-19 pandemic. A quantitative approach was used with an empirical and descriptive cross-sectional methodology. Surveys were administered to tourists, yielding 326 valid questionnaires in Costa Rica and 318 in Ecuador. The variables studied included sociodemographic characteristics, factors affecting adventure tourism, and key requirements for this activity. For data analysis, non-parametric tests such as Mann–Whitney U and Wilcoxon were employed due to the ordinal nature of the variables and the presence of skewed distributions. The results revealed significant differences in tourists’ perceptions between Ecuador’s coastal destinations and Costa Rica’s natural destinations. Among the main conclusions, it is highlighted that the geographical context significantly impacts the perception of adventure tourism. Tourists in Ecuador perceived better fulfillment of key requirements, greater biosecurity, learning opportunities, social influence, and relaxation than tourists in Costa Rica. These findings offer a deeper understanding of current trends and provide practical recommendations for improving adventure tourism in both countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Business & Management
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2482012
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cruise Tourism Development and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Key requirements for adventure tourism: a comparative study of Ecuador and Costa Rica

Ana Gabriela Víquez-Paniagua, Orly Carvache‐Franco, Mauricio Carvache‐Franco, Wilmer Carvache‐Franco et al.
1 citations
Cogent Business & Management
Cruise Tourism Development and Management
2.18
article

Key requirements for adventure tourism: a comparative study of Ecuador and Costa Rica

Ana Gabriela Víquez-Paniagua, Orly Carvache‐Franco, Mauricio Carvache‐Franco, Wilmer Carvache‐Franco, Marlen Treviño-Villalobos, Luis Felipe Sancho-Jiménez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the factors influencing the requirements for adventure tourism among Costa Rican and Ecuadorian tourists after the COVID-19 pandemic. A quantitative approach was used with an empirical and descriptive cross-sectional methodology. Surveys were administered to tourists, yielding 326 valid questionnaires in Costa Rica and 318 in Ecuador. The variables studied included sociodemographic characteristics, factors affecting adventure tourism, and key requirements for this activity. For data analysis, non-parametric tests such as Mann–Whitney U and Wilcoxon were employed due to the ordinal nature of the variables and the presence of skewed distributions. The results revealed significant differences in tourists’ perceptions between Ecuador’s coastal destinations and Costa Rica’s natural destinations. Among the main conclusions, it is highlighted that the geographical context significantly impacts the perception of adventure tourism. Tourists in Ecuador perceived better fulfillment of key requirements, greater biosecurity, learning opportunities, social influence, and relaxation than tourists in Costa Rica. These findings offer a deeper understanding of current trends and provide practical recommendations for improving adventure tourism in both countries.

Cogent Business & ManagementVol. 12(1)
Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica (CR), Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral (EC), Universidad Espíritu Santo (EC), Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar (BO), Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cruise Tourism Development and Management
2.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.