Quality assurance of seismological bulletins using waveform cross-correlation

Waveform cross-correlation (WCC) significantly improves detection, regular phase association, and hypothesis generation of seismic events at the International Data Center (IDC) of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO). In aftershock sequences of small, medium, and very large earthquakes, extra 50% to 80% of events were found that, by their parameters, should have been included in the IDC Standard Event Bulletin (SEB). Several percent of the aftershocks published in the SEB were not detected using cross-correlation, even when signals from all other events in the same sequences were used as templates. In this paper, we study several cases of lack of cross-correlation confirmation of IDC events obtained by experienced analysts in routine interactive analysis. Regional catalogues, which usually include aftershocks with magnitudes down to 2.0, are used as references when comparing the WCC-based and IDC bulletins. Since the resolution of regional networks is at least one magnitude unit higher, the SEB events missed in the corresponding regional catalogues can probably be considered as false or significantly inaccurate. The events are compared by origin time and location, since the regional networks and the International Monitoring System use different seismic stations, and direct comparison of phase arrivals is impossible. Two aftershock sequences are studied: after the earthquake of March 20, 2008 in China with mb(IDC)=5.4 and the event of May 20, 2012 in Italy (L’Aquila) with mb(IDC)=5.3. In general, most events not found in the SEB using the WCC are missing from the corresponding regional catalogues. At the same time, these catalogues confirm most additional IDC-ready events found only using cross-correlation. This observation confirms the conclusions about the high statistical reliability of events constructed using the WCC, as well as the possibility of expanding the SEB by 50 percent or more with events that are correct according to the IDC event definition criteria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Seismology
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35540/2686-7907.2025.1.02
Primary Topic
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality assurance of seismological bulletins using waveform cross-correlation

Ivan Kitov, И. А. Санина
Russian Journal of Seismology
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
article

Quality assurance of seismological bulletins using waveform cross-correlation

Ivan Kitov, И. А. Санина
article en

Abstract

Waveform cross-correlation (WCC) significantly improves detection, regular phase association, and hypothesis generation of seismic events at the International Data Center (IDC) of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO). In aftershock sequences of small, medium, and very large earthquakes, extra 50% to 80% of events were found that, by their parameters, should have been included in the IDC Standard Event Bulletin (SEB). Several percent of the aftershocks published in the SEB were not detected using cross-correlation, even when signals from all other events in the same sequences were used as templates. In this paper, we study several cases of lack of cross-correlation confirmation of IDC events obtained by experienced analysts in routine interactive analysis. Regional catalogues, which usually include aftershocks with magnitudes down to 2.0, are used as references when comparing the WCC-based and IDC bulletins. Since the resolution of regional networks is at least one magnitude unit higher, the SEB events missed in the corresponding regional catalogues can probably be considered as false or significantly inaccurate. The events are compared by origin time and location, since the regional networks and the International Monitoring System use different seismic stations, and direct comparison of phase arrivals is impossible. Two aftershock sequences are studied: after the earthquake of March 20, 2008 in China with mb(IDC)=5.4 and the event of May 20, 2012 in Italy (L’Aquila) with mb(IDC)=5.3. In general, most events not found in the SEB using the WCC are missing from the corresponding regional catalogues. At the same time, these catalogues confirm most additional IDC-ready events found only using cross-correlation. This observation confirms the conclusions about the high statistical reliability of events constructed using the WCC, as well as the possibility of expanding the SEB by 50 percent or more with events that are correct according to the IDC event definition criteria.

Russian Journal of SeismologyVol. 7(1)
Institute of Geosphere Dynamics (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.