Societal perceptions of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: strategic communicative action in problem solving

Purpose The current study seeks to understand the strategic communicative processes in which various health information seeking media sources impact intentions to engage with opposing positions of specific health behaviors such as COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Guided by the situational theory of problem-solving (STOPS) framework, the study explores the relationships between traditional media use and social media use, or information acquisition as an antecedent, on perceptions of problem recognition, constraint recognition and involvement recognition, which in turn, impact situational motivation for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Design/methodology/approach A quantitative online survey involving 239 U.S. participants was conducted for this study. Findings Results found that those who recognize COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy as a problematic situation, who wanted to learn more about vaccine hesitancy and who felt low constraint were more motivated to solve the situation and had greater intentions to share and permit information. Specifically, traditional media use positively predicted problem recognition while social media use positively predicted the level of involvement but did not significantly predict problem recognition. Originality/value Findings contribute to public health research by demonstrating that awareness and knowledge of societal-level problematic situations can positively impact communicative behaviors. Results extend STOPS by exploring the mediating impacts that situational factors have on health communication behaviors and extend existing literature by differentiating the separate effects of information seeking source types on situational variables. Study findings provide practical implications for public health professionals and educators. Specifically, understanding levels of recognition with a problematic situation allows for strategic health messaging to be more impactful for specific types of publics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Communication Management
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-07-2024-0114
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Societal perceptions of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: strategic communicative action in problem solving

Anne Marie Borsai Basaran, Linda Dam
1 citations
Journal of Communication Management
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
2.17
article

Societal perceptions of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: strategic communicative action in problem solving

Anne Marie Borsai Basaran, Linda Dam
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose The current study seeks to understand the strategic communicative processes in which various health information seeking media sources impact intentions to engage with opposing positions of specific health behaviors such as COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Guided by the situational theory of problem-solving (STOPS) framework, the study explores the relationships between traditional media use and social media use, or information acquisition as an antecedent, on perceptions of problem recognition, constraint recognition and involvement recognition, which in turn, impact situational motivation for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Design/methodology/approach A quantitative online survey involving 239 U.S. participants was conducted for this study. Findings Results found that those who recognize COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy as a problematic situation, who wanted to learn more about vaccine hesitancy and who felt low constraint were more motivated to solve the situation and had greater intentions to share and permit information. Specifically, traditional media use positively predicted problem recognition while social media use positively predicted the level of involvement but did not significantly predict problem recognition. Originality/value Findings contribute to public health research by demonstrating that awareness and knowledge of societal-level problematic situations can positively impact communicative behaviors. Results extend STOPS by exploring the mediating impacts that situational factors have on health communication behaviors and extend existing literature by differentiating the separate effects of information seeking source types on situational variables. Study findings provide practical implications for public health professionals and educators. Specifically, understanding levels of recognition with a problematic situation allows for strategic health messaging to be more impactful for specific types of publics.

Journal of Communication ManagementVol. 30(1)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.