Issue Leadership Research Trends and Future Research Agenda

The purpose of this study is to present research trends and future research questions on issue leadership. For this study, 43 research articles on issue leadership published journals in korea were analysed for research trends. First, we analysed the general status of the articles, including when they were published, the journals in which they were published, and the characteristics of the research sample. Next, we analysed the research methodology, including the type of research, data collection method, measurement tools, and reliability and validity verification methods. Finally, we classified the research models of the analysed papers into outcome variable verification research and antecedent variable verification research, analysed the impact of issue leadership on outcomes and the impact between issue leadership and variables, and presented the differences between the research models. In this regard, empirical research on issue leadership has been conducted since 2000, and until recently, two to five empirical studies were conducted each year. Most studies have used issue leadership as an independent variable to identify the causal relationship between issue leadership and outcome variables. Self-efficacy, adaptive strain, and task interdependence have been considered as antecedents, and variables such as job satisfaction, organisational performance, and organisational citizenship behaviour have been studied as outcome variables. The mediation effect between issue leadership and outcome variables was studied by considering variables such as followership, empowerment, and organisational sponsorship perceptions, and the moderator variable was studied by considering variables such as task environment, supervisor support, and CEO competence. The significance of this study is that by comprehensively analysing and discussing the research achievements on issue leadership through a review of the domestic literature on issue leadership, this study not only provided the overall flow of issue leadership research but also suggested future research directions. Finally, the research limitations of the analysed papers and research issues for further research were presented.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Academy Of Leadership
Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22243/tklq.2024.15.4.3
Primary Topic
Educational Systems and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Issue Leadership Research Trends and Future Research Agenda

Ki Bok Baik, Jung Hoon Kim, Gyeong Hun Ko
1 links
Korean Academy Of Leadership
Educational Systems and Policies
article

Issue Leadership Research Trends and Future Research Agenda

Ki Bok Baik, Jung Hoon Kim, Gyeong Hun Ko
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present research trends and future research questions on issue leadership. For this study, 43 research articles on issue leadership published journals in korea were analysed for research trends. First, we analysed the general status of the articles, including when they were published, the journals in which they were published, and the characteristics of the research sample. Next, we analysed the research methodology, including the type of research, data collection method, measurement tools, and reliability and validity verification methods. Finally, we classified the research models of the analysed papers into outcome variable verification research and antecedent variable verification research, analysed the impact of issue leadership on outcomes and the impact between issue leadership and variables, and presented the differences between the research models. In this regard, empirical research on issue leadership has been conducted since 2000, and until recently, two to five empirical studies were conducted each year. Most studies have used issue leadership as an independent variable to identify the causal relationship between issue leadership and outcome variables. Self-efficacy, adaptive strain, and task interdependence have been considered as antecedents, and variables such as job satisfaction, organisational performance, and organisational citizenship behaviour have been studied as outcome variables. The mediation effect between issue leadership and outcome variables was studied by considering variables such as followership, empowerment, and organisational sponsorship perceptions, and the moderator variable was studied by considering variables such as task environment, supervisor support, and CEO competence. The significance of this study is that by comprehensively analysing and discussing the research achievements on issue leadership through a review of the domestic literature on issue leadership, this study not only provided the overall flow of issue leadership research but also suggested future research directions. Finally, the research limitations of the analysed papers and research issues for further research were presented.

Korean Academy Of LeadershipVol. 15(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Educational Systems and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Issue Leadership Research Trends and Future Research Agenda — Ki Bok Baik, Jung Hoon Kim, et al. · Korean Academy Of Leadership (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS