The patient enablement instrument for back pain turkish version, validity and reliability study

BackgroundThe only survey that assesses the ability of individuals with low back pain to self-manage their condition is the Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP).ObjectiveThe study aims to create a Turkish version of PEI-BP and test its validity and reliability.Methods67 individuals (47 females, 20 males) with low back pain participated, comprising. Reliability was evaluated through test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and repeatability measures. Validity was assessed via structural, content, face validity analyses. Floor and ceiling effects were examined to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. Additionally, the relationship between PEI-BP and pain intensity, Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) was explored.ResultsThe Intraclass Correlation Coefficient value (0.795) and Cronbach's α (0.886) of PEI-BP were high. The goodness-of-fit values for the model, including fit indices and reference ranges, indicated strong validity. The PEI-BP demonstrated the absence of both floor and ceiling effects. Correlations between PEI-BP and pain intensity, BIPQ, FABQ, ODI, and SF-36 exhibited a range from weak to good (0.258 to -0.440).ConclusionsPEI-BP has demonstrated high reliability and good validity. PEI-BP can be used to evaluate Turkish-speaking individuals with low back pain.<b>ClinicalTrials.gov ID:</b> NCT06109246 (Date: 10/25/2023).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251322855
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The patient enablement instrument for back pain turkish version, validity and reliability study

Halime Arıkan, Erkan Erol
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

The patient enablement instrument for back pain turkish version, validity and reliability study

Halime Arıkan, Erkan Erol
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe only survey that assesses the ability of individuals with low back pain to self-manage their condition is the Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP).ObjectiveThe study aims to create a Turkish version of PEI-BP and test its validity and reliability.Methods67 individuals (47 females, 20 males) with low back pain participated, comprising. Reliability was evaluated through test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and repeatability measures. Validity was assessed via structural, content, face validity analyses. Floor and ceiling effects were examined to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. Additionally, the relationship between PEI-BP and pain intensity, Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) was explored.ResultsThe Intraclass Correlation Coefficient value (0.795) and Cronbach's α (0.886) of PEI-BP were high. The goodness-of-fit values for the model, including fit indices and reference ranges, indicated strong validity. The PEI-BP demonstrated the absence of both floor and ceiling effects. Correlations between PEI-BP and pain intensity, BIPQ, FABQ, ODI, and SF-36 exhibited a range from weak to good (0.258 to -0.440).ConclusionsPEI-BP has demonstrated high reliability and good validity. PEI-BP can be used to evaluate Turkish-speaking individuals with low back pain.<b>ClinicalTrials.gov ID:</b> NCT06109246 (Date: 10/25/2023).

Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal RehabilitationVol. 38(5)
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.