Cryptocurrency Contagion: How Does It Differ From the Commodity Contagion?

Given the recent substantial increase in market capitalization of bitcoin (BTC) and oil, both of them are considered alternative investments and could affect the traditional financial markets. This study compares the contagions between bitcoin (BTC) and oil to major American, European, and Asian equity markets. The contagion analysis follows the procedures from Forbes and Rigobon (2002) in analyzing the jumps in the correlation coefficients and suggests a new idea by extracting and evaluating the idiosyncratic components. The idiosyncratic part refers to the unique series after filtering the common/global part. Analyzing this part allows us to prevent bias due to global factors. This novelty analysis extends previous studies by filtering the common factor. Thus, allowing us to thoroughly investigate specific country. Using the daily return series from January 1, 2016, to January 1, 2024 (downloaded from the investing website), I document that both BTC and oil transmit contagion to the major equity markets, albeit in different directions. BTC (oil) tends to trigger positive (negative) contagion. The results are consistent regardless of whether the daily return or idiosyncratic series are used and when the correlations are adjusted for heteroskedasticity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
KINERJA
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24002/kinerja.v29i1.10043
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cryptocurrency Contagion: How Does It Differ From the Commodity Contagion?

Rangga Handika
KINERJA
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

Cryptocurrency Contagion: How Does It Differ From the Commodity Contagion?

Rangga Handika
article en

Abstract

Given the recent substantial increase in market capitalization of bitcoin (BTC) and oil, both of them are considered alternative investments and could affect the traditional financial markets. This study compares the contagions between bitcoin (BTC) and oil to major American, European, and Asian equity markets. The contagion analysis follows the procedures from Forbes and Rigobon (2002) in analyzing the jumps in the correlation coefficients and suggests a new idea by extracting and evaluating the idiosyncratic components. The idiosyncratic part refers to the unique series after filtering the common/global part. Analyzing this part allows us to prevent bias due to global factors. This novelty analysis extends previous studies by filtering the common factor. Thus, allowing us to thoroughly investigate specific country. Using the daily return series from January 1, 2016, to January 1, 2024 (downloaded from the investing website), I document that both BTC and oil transmit contagion to the major equity markets, albeit in different directions. BTC (oil) tends to trigger positive (negative) contagion. The results are consistent regardless of whether the daily return or idiosyncratic series are used and when the correlations are adjusted for heteroskedasticity.

KINERJAVol. 29(1)
Tokyo International University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cryptocurrency Contagion: How Does It Differ From the Commodity Contagion? — Rangga Handika · KINERJA (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS