American Counter-Insurgency Operations in the Philippines and the Question of War Atrocities

Theories of war atrocities, both against enemy combatants and civilian populations, are almost entirely concerned with the motivations and factors contributing to states’ norm-violating behaviors during war situations. In many cases, especially where the leading states of the international system are involved, states violate international norms when they believe they can justify their actions in the eyes of other states and the world’s public opinion. I will argue, in this paper, that within the context of the colonial wars in the age of Imperialism, the justification was based on first, a “civilization” notion that distinguished between a group of nations organized into modern sovereign states and abiding by the conventional modes of Western warfare and those who did not, and second, on an alleged “civilizing” mission for imperialist acquisitions around the world that helped to replace the logic of war with that of law enforcement operation, on the other. Thus, by disassociating the military operations in the colonies from the context of war and placing it within the category of “policing actions”, colonial powers claimed exemption from following the laws and customs of war norms regarding the humane treatment of the captured enemy combatants and the privileged status of neutral and uninvolved civilian populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal of Social Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2025.133040
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

American Counter-Insurgency Operations in the Philippines and the Question of War Atrocities

Farnaz Ganjeloo
1 links
Open Journal of Social Sciences
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

American Counter-Insurgency Operations in the Philippines and the Question of War Atrocities

Farnaz Ganjeloo
article en

Abstract

Theories of war atrocities, both against enemy combatants and civilian populations, are almost entirely concerned with the motivations and factors contributing to states’ norm-violating behaviors during war situations. In many cases, especially where the leading states of the international system are involved, states violate international norms when they believe they can justify their actions in the eyes of other states and the world’s public opinion. I will argue, in this paper, that within the context of the colonial wars in the age of Imperialism, the justification was based on first, a “civilization” notion that distinguished between a group of nations organized into modern sovereign states and abiding by the conventional modes of Western warfare and those who did not, and second, on an alleged “civilizing” mission for imperialist acquisitions around the world that helped to replace the logic of war with that of law enforcement operation, on the other. Thus, by disassociating the military operations in the colonies from the context of war and placing it within the category of “policing actions”, colonial powers claimed exemption from following the laws and customs of war norms regarding the humane treatment of the captured enemy combatants and the privileged status of neutral and uninvolved civilian populations.

Open Journal of Social SciencesVol. 13(03)
Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.