Life cycle assessment and energy characterization of friction surfacing deposition of aluminum alloys

In this work, an experimental investigation of Friction Surfacing Deposition (FSD) using the 2000-series heat-treatable aluminum alloy was performed including the environmental impact characterization of the process. The effect of main controlling process parameters and their interactions on energy demand during the single layer deposition was evaluated. A full Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) analysis was conducted for layer-by-layer deposition and a comparison of FSD with the Cold Metal Transfer Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) was performed for a specific wall-shaped sample production. It was observed that the FSD process is characterized by lower processing energy than WAAM, but also by a much higher amount of material scrap connected to undeposited parts of consumable tools such as a flash. To assess the possibility of reducing the material waste during FSD, the comparative LCA analysis was expanded to study the impact of the deposited layer length. It was shown that the FSD method can be a more environmentally friendly process when the deposition of at least 450-mm-long layer using a unique tool is required. • SEC with varying deposition rate and process scrap quantification of FSD is presented. • A comparative LCA analysis between FSD and WAAM is carried out. • Environmental impact of FSD technology is badly affected by the larger amount of process scrap. • The LCA comparative analysis is developed with varying the deposition length. • For deposition lengths shorter than 462 mm WAAM outperforms FSD, otherwise FSD is to be preferred.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.03.008
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life cycle assessment and energy characterization of friction surfacing deposition of aluminum alloys

К. Н. Калашников, Livan Fratini, Giuseppe Ingarao, Gianni Campatelli et al.
7 citations
Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
4.78
article

Life cycle assessment and energy characterization of friction surfacing deposition of aluminum alloys

К. Н. Калашников, Livan Fratini, Giuseppe Ingarao, Gianni Campatelli, Simone Amantia
article en
7 citations

Abstract

In this work, an experimental investigation of Friction Surfacing Deposition (FSD) using the 2000-series heat-treatable aluminum alloy was performed including the environmental impact characterization of the process. The effect of main controlling process parameters and their interactions on energy demand during the single layer deposition was evaluated. A full Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) analysis was conducted for layer-by-layer deposition and a comparison of FSD with the Cold Metal Transfer Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) was performed for a specific wall-shaped sample production. It was observed that the FSD process is characterized by lower processing energy than WAAM, but also by a much higher amount of material scrap connected to undeposited parts of consumable tools such as a flash. To assess the possibility of reducing the material waste during FSD, the comparative LCA analysis was expanded to study the impact of the deposited layer length. It was shown that the FSD method can be a more environmentally friendly process when the deposition of at least 450-mm-long layer using a unique tool is required. • SEC with varying deposition rate and process scrap quantification of FSD is presented. • A comparative LCA analysis between FSD and WAAM is carried out. • Environmental impact of FSD technology is badly affected by the larger amount of process scrap. • The LCA comparative analysis is developed with varying the deposition length. • For deposition lengths shorter than 462 mm WAAM outperforms FSD, otherwise FSD is to be preferred.

Journal of Manufacturing SystemsVol. 80
University of Florence (IT), University of Palermo (IT)
European Commission, Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
4.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.