Pilots’ training backgrounds affecting the attribution of event causal factors and airline safety management

For safety management in diverse aviation operators, it is necessary to investigate how different cultural factors interact in flight operations. Whilst prior studies have evaluated between-group cultural differences, there remains a research gap on whether within-group subcultural differences challenge the assimilation of people into the safety culture of the wider group. Cultural differences in how causal factors are perceived in the context of systemic safety deficiencies can affect the implementation of safety management strategies. In the present study, pilots from airline-sponsored, self-funded, and ex-military initial training backgrounds were invited to categorise an identical set of aircraft accident causal factors using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). Results from 121 participants found significant differences amongst the three groups in the attribution of human factors conditions to organisational-level and supervisory-level categories. Significant associations amongst HFACS categories also differed amongst the three professional groups, with a considerable number of same-level associations found between ‘Preconditions for Unsafe Acts’ at the same level. Familiarity with organizational cultures was considered to impact the perception of causal factors. The finding of same-level associations presents a new contribution to the theoretical basis of the HFACS taxonomy, calling for a conceptual change in the directionality of causal sequences. The results suggest that the direction of safety remedies for different parts of the organisation is dependent on perceived relevance, which differs amongst subcultural groups. Findings are relevant to industry, particularly international airlines with diverse employee subcultural groups, for the implementation of safety management systems. • Airline-sponsored, self-funded, and ex-military experience implants persistent cultural values. • Familiarity between operators and organisations leads to aligned safety perceptions. • Airline-sponsored cadets are less likely to attribute precursors to latent conditions. • Self-funded and ex-military pilots are more critical of organizational and operations factors. • Association between same-level categories suggests need to streamline HFACS taxonomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Air Transport Management
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2025.102786
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pilots’ training backgrounds affecting the attribution of event causal factors and airline safety management

Wen‐Chin Li, Graham Braithwaite, Wesley Tsz-Kin Chan
4 citations
Journal of Air Transport Management
Occupational Health and Safety Research
6.16
article

Pilots’ training backgrounds affecting the attribution of event causal factors and airline safety management

Wen‐Chin Li, Graham Braithwaite, Wesley Tsz-Kin Chan
article en
4 citations

Abstract

For safety management in diverse aviation operators, it is necessary to investigate how different cultural factors interact in flight operations. Whilst prior studies have evaluated between-group cultural differences, there remains a research gap on whether within-group subcultural differences challenge the assimilation of people into the safety culture of the wider group. Cultural differences in how causal factors are perceived in the context of systemic safety deficiencies can affect the implementation of safety management strategies. In the present study, pilots from airline-sponsored, self-funded, and ex-military initial training backgrounds were invited to categorise an identical set of aircraft accident causal factors using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). Results from 121 participants found significant differences amongst the three groups in the attribution of human factors conditions to organisational-level and supervisory-level categories. Significant associations amongst HFACS categories also differed amongst the three professional groups, with a considerable number of same-level associations found between ‘Preconditions for Unsafe Acts’ at the same level. Familiarity with organizational cultures was considered to impact the perception of causal factors. The finding of same-level associations presents a new contribution to the theoretical basis of the HFACS taxonomy, calling for a conceptual change in the directionality of causal sequences. The results suggest that the direction of safety remedies for different parts of the organisation is dependent on perceived relevance, which differs amongst subcultural groups. Findings are relevant to industry, particularly international airlines with diverse employee subcultural groups, for the implementation of safety management systems. • Airline-sponsored, self-funded, and ex-military experience implants persistent cultural values. • Familiarity between operators and organisations leads to aligned safety perceptions. • Airline-sponsored cadets are less likely to attribute precursors to latent conditions. • Self-funded and ex-military pilots are more critical of organizational and operations factors. • Association between same-level categories suggests need to streamline HFACS taxonomy.

Journal of Air Transport ManagementVol. 125
Cranfield University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
6.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.